Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Inducing Meningococcal Meningitis Serogroup C in Mice via Intracisternal Delivery
Published on: November 5, 2019
Clinical decision rules for evaluating meningitis in children
François Dubos1, Alain Martinot, Dominique Gendrel
1Department of Pediatric Emergencies and Infectious Diseases, Roger-Salengro Hospital, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France.
Purpose Of Review:
Distinguishing between bacterial and aseptic meningitis in children is sometimes difficult. Guidelines recommend that patients with acute meningitis be systematically hospitalized and treated with antibiotics until the cerebrospinal fluid culture results are available. This strategy ensures rapid treatment for bacterial meningitis, but also involves unnecessary admissions and antibiotics for aseptic meningitis. Some authors have, therefore, proposed different combinations of predictors in clinical decision rules to distinguish as early as possible between bacterial and aseptic meningitis. To be useful, these rules must have near-100% sensitivity for bacterial meningitis, good specificity (to reduce unnecessary antibiotics and admissions), and easy bedside application.
Recent Findings:
The present review examines the performance and level of validation of decision rules proposed after the Haemophilus influenzae vaccination entered widespread use. Most of these rules have been validated incompletely, if at all. Only one rule incorporates the best single validated predictive marker for distinguishing between bacterial and aseptic meningitis in children: serum procalcitonin level.
Summary:
Two rules are highly promising, meeting the three major conditions after a retrospective validation process in large samples. These rules can be applied cautiously to patients with the same inclusion and exclusion criteria as those in the derivation sets, while awaiting prospective multicenter validation studies.
Insights
Distinguishing bacterial from aseptic meningitis in children is challenging. New clinical decision rules show promise for accurate bedside diagnosis, potentially reducing unnecessary hospitalizations and antibiotic use.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric infectious diseases
- Clinical decision making
- Diagnostic accuracy
Background:
- Differentiating bacterial and aseptic meningitis in children presents diagnostic challenges.
- Current guidelines advocate broad antibiotic use pending cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) culture results, leading to overuse in aseptic cases.
- Clinical decision rules aim for early, accurate differentiation to optimize treatment and resource allocation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the performance and validation of clinical decision rules for distinguishing bacterial from aseptic meningitis in children.
- To identify reliable predictors for early diagnosis post-Haemophilus influenzae vaccination.
- To assess the utility of rules meeting criteria for sensitivity, specificity, and bedside application.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of decision rules proposed after the introduction of Haemophilus influenzae vaccination.
- Evaluation of rule validation levels and performance metrics.
- Identification of the most validated predictive markers, including serum procalcitonin.
Main Results:
- Most reviewed decision rules exhibit incomplete or lacking validation.
- Serum procalcitonin level is identified as the single best validated predictive marker.
- Two promising rules demonstrate high sensitivity and specificity in retrospective validation.
Conclusions:
- Two clinical decision rules show significant promise for differentiating bacterial and aseptic meningitis in children.
- These rules meet key criteria for clinical utility and can be cautiously applied.
- Prospective multicenter validation studies are needed to confirm findings and guide broader implementation.
Related Concept Videos
Bacterial Meningitis I: Introduction
Viral Meningitis
Bacterial Meningitis
Bacterial Meningitis II: Pathophysiology
Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever
Encephalitis l: Introduction