Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Studies should be controlled, randomized, and blinded
1Amgen, Inc., Thousand Oaks, California, USA. raparker@amgen.com
Abstract:
Rigorous assessment of the efficacy and safety of a new therapy requires a concurrent control group, randomization, and blinding. The control group allows comparison with a contemporaneous patient group. Randomization, properly done, avoids systematic bias between treatment groups and should balance other factors, reducing the likelihood of group differences due to patient characteristics. Blinding minimizes the risk of biases stemming from patients' and assessors' beliefs, actions, and hopes about the treatment received. This is critical given the substantial effect that such beliefs can have on outcome, often termed the "placebo effect." New and exciting technologies would probably be particularly susceptible to the placebo effect, making blinding even more critical when studying such treatments.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Blinding
Blind Procedures
Controls in Experiments
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
