Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
Bias01:22

Bias

Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when researchers try to extrapolate results...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least squares (OLS)...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cefazolin for Methicillin-Susceptible <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> Bacteremia.

The New England journal of medicine·2026
Same author

Bayesian analysis in confirmatory clinical trials: A narrative review and discussion of current practice.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same author

Elective Cesarean Section for Maternal Preference.

The New England journal of medicine·2026
Same author

Embracing Bayesian Methods in Clinical Trials: FDA's Long-Awaited Draft Guidance.

JAMA·2026
Same author

Study design for an emulated trial of a 2 arm, parallel, stratified, adaptive, RCT of CABG versus PCI in people requiring myocardial revascularization at high risk (High-Risk REVASC).

American heart journal·2026
Same author

Mendelian Randomization With Longitudinal Exposure Data: Simulation Study and Real Data Application.

Statistics in medicine·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

Bias modelling in evidence synthesis.

Rebecca M Turner, David J Spiegelhalter, Gordon C S Smith

    Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, (Statistics in Society)
    |April 22, 2009
    PubMed
    Summary

    This study introduces simple methods for evidence synthesis, adjusting for study rigor and relevance. Bias-adjusted meta-analysis downweights less reliable studies, improving policy decisions based on all available evidence.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jun 23, 2026

    Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
    05:47

    Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

    Published on: June 13, 2025

    Area of Science:

    • Biostatistics
    • Health Services Research
    • Evidence-Based Medicine

    Background:

    • Policy decisions rely on synthesizing evidence from diverse sources.
    • Studies often vary in methodological rigor and relevance to the specific policy question.
    • Existing synthesis methods may not adequately account for these variations.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To present simple, bias-adjusted methods for evidence synthesis.
    • To account for differences in study rigor (internal bias) and relevance (external bias).
    • To improve the reliability of evidence used in policy decisions.

    Main Methods:

    • Developed bias modeling to represent study-specific biases using elicited opinion.
    • Constructed prior distributions to quantify biases in individual studies.
    • Performed a bias-adjusted meta-analysis on a case study of antenatal care technology appraisal.

    Main Results:

    • Bias adjustment shifted the combined estimate by approximately 10% away from the null.
    • The variance of the combined estimate increased nearly threefold after adjustment.
    • Less rigorous or relevant studies were downweighted using computationally simple methods.

    Conclusions:

    • Generic bias modeling allows incorporation of all available evidence in decision-making.
    • The proposed methods provide a more nuanced approach to evidence synthesis.
    • This facilitates evidence-based policy decisions by appropriately weighting study contributions.