Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: ANOVA01:12

Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: ANOVA

Analysis of Variance, or ANOVA, is a powerful statistical technique used to analyze parametric data, primarily in research and experimental studies. It's designed to compare the means of two or more groups, assisting researchers in identifying any significant differences between these group means. There are two main types of ANOVA based on the complexity of the analysis: one-way and two-way.
One-way ANOVA is applied when a single independent variable or factor is scrutinized. It compares the...
DNA Microarrays02:34

DNA Microarrays

Microarrays are high-throughput and relatively inexpensive assays that can be automated to analyze large quantities of data at a time. They are used in genome-wide studies to compare gene or protein expression under two varied conditions, such as healthy and diseased states. Microarrays consist of glass or silica slides on which probe molecules are covalently attached through surface functionalization. Most commonly, the slides are prepared through the chemisorption of silanes to silica...
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance, comparing...
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

PDA (Privacy-Preserving Distributed Algorithms) in action: ten principles for high-quality multi-site clinical evidence generation.

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA·2026
Same author

Nonparametric Density Estimation of a Long-Term Trend from Repeated Semicontinuous Data.

Journal of the American Statistical Association·2026
Same author

Synergistic Chemoimmunotherapy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma via ROS-Responsive Carrier-Free Prodrug Nanoparticles.

Nano letters·2026
Same author

Generative AI-assisted Bayesian-frequentist Hybrid Inference in Single-cell RNA Sequencing Analysis for Genes Associated with Alzheimer's Disease.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Application of the Total Nutrient Index as a Precision Nutrition Tool to Address Dietary Recommendations Across the Life Course.

Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics·2026
Same author

COVID-19 in hemodialysis patients: New insights into metabolomic profile dynamics from 60 days pre- to 60 days post-diagnosis.

PloS one·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Using Microarrays to Interrogate Microenvironmental Impact on Cellular Phenotypes in Cancer
08:20

Using Microarrays to Interrogate Microenvironmental Impact on Cellular Phenotypes in Cancer

Published on: May 21, 2019

Nonparametric variance estimation in the analysis of microarray data: a measurement error approach.

Raymond J Carroll1, Yuedong Wang

  • 1Department of Statistics, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-3143, U.S.A., carroll@stat.tamu.edu.

Biometrika
|April 22, 2009
PubMed
Summary

Ignoring measurement error or using standard simulation extrapolation (SIMEX) leads to inconsistent variance function estimators. A new permutation SIMEX method offers theoretical consistency for improved nonparametric variance estimation.

More Related Videos

An Allele-specific Gene Expression Assay to Test the Functional Basis of Genetic Associations
10:17

An Allele-specific Gene Expression Assay to Test the Functional Basis of Genetic Associations

Published on: November 3, 2010

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Using Microarrays to Interrogate Microenvironmental Impact on Cellular Phenotypes in Cancer
08:20

Using Microarrays to Interrogate Microenvironmental Impact on Cellular Phenotypes in Cancer

Published on: May 21, 2019

An Allele-specific Gene Expression Assay to Test the Functional Basis of Genetic Associations
10:17

An Allele-specific Gene Expression Assay to Test the Functional Basis of Genetic Associations

Published on: November 3, 2010

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Biostatistics
  • Genomics

Background:

  • Measurement error is a common challenge in statistical modeling.
  • Nonparametric variance function estimation is crucial for accurate data analysis.
  • Existing methods may produce biased or inconsistent results when measurement error is present.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of measurement error on nonparametric variance function estimation.
  • To evaluate the performance of the simulation extrapolation (SIMEX) method and propose an improved approach.
  • To provide consistent estimators for variance functions in the presence of measurement error.

Main Methods:

  • Investigated the effects of measurement error on nonparametric variance function estimation.
  • Applied and evaluated the direct simulation extrapolation (SIMEX) method.
  • Proposed and theoretically validated a novel permutation SIMEX method.
  • Utilized simulation studies to compare method performance.
  • Illustrated the methodology with real-world microarray data.

Main Results:

  • Ignoring measurement error leads to inconsistent estimators.
  • Direct SIMEX reduces bias but remains inconsistent.
  • The proposed permutation SIMEX method yields consistent estimators in theory.
  • Both SIMEX methods outperform ignoring measurement error in simulations.
  • Performance depends on approximations to exact extrapolants.

Conclusions:

  • Measurement error significantly impacts nonparametric variance function estimation.
  • The permutation SIMEX method provides a theoretically sound and consistent approach.
  • The proposed method offers improved accuracy for variance function estimation in the presence of measurement error.
  • The methodology is applicable to complex biological datasets, such as microarray data.