Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Standardized Technique of Aortic Valve Re-implantation for Valve-sparing Aortic Root Replacement
Published on: December 11, 2017
Aortic root surgery in septuagenarians: impact of different surgical techniques
Nawid Khaladj1, Rainer Leyh, Malakh Shrestha
1Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Transplantation and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany. Khaladj.Nawid@mh-hannover.de
Background:
To evaluate the impact and safety of different surgical techniques for aortic root replacement (ARR) on early and late morbidity and mortality in septuagenarians undergoing ARR.
Methods:
Ninety-five patients (73.8 +/- 3.2 years) were operated and divided into three groups according to the aortic root procedure; MECH-group (n = 51) patients with a mechanical composite graft, BIO-group (n = 22) patients with a customized biological composite graft, and REIMPL-group (n = 22) patients with a valve sparing aortic root reimplantation (David I). In 42.1% (40/95) of these patients the aortic arch was replaced. Follow-up was completed in 95.2% (79/83) of in-hospital survivors.
Results:
Hospital mortality was 12.6% (12/95) in the entire population (MECH. 15.7% (8/51), BIO 19.7% (4/22), REIMPL 0% (0/22); p = 0.004). Two patients died intraoperatively. The most frequent postoperative complications were prolonged mechanical ventilation ((>48 h) in 16.8% (16/93) (MECH. 7% (7/51), BIO 36.4% (8/22), REIMPL 4.5% (1/22); p = 0.013) and rethoracotomy for postoperative bleeding in 12.6% (12/95) (MECH. 12% (6/51), BIO 22.7% (5/22), REIMPL 4.5% (1/22); p = 0.19). Nineteen late deaths (22.9%) (19/83) (MECH 34.8% (15/43), BIO 16.7% (3/18), REIMPL 4.5% (1/22); p = 0.012) occurred during a mean follow-up of 41 +/- 42 months (MECH 48 +/- 48 months, BIO 25 +/- 37 months, REIMPL 40 +/- 28 months, p = 0.028). Postoperative NYHA class decreased significantly (p = 0.017) and performance status (p = 0.027) increased for the entire group compared to preoperative values.
Conclusion:
Our data indicate that valve sparing aortic root reimplantation is safe and effective in septuagenarians, and is associated with low early and late morbidity and mortality.
Insights
Valve sparing aortic root reimplantation is a safe and effective procedure for septuagenarians, demonstrating lower early and late mortality compared to other aortic root replacement techniques. This approach improves patient outcomes and quality of life.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Thoracic Surgery
- Aortic Surgery
Background:
- Septuagenarians undergoing aortic root replacement (ARR) face significant early and late morbidity and mortality risks.
- Evaluating the safety and impact of different ARR surgical techniques in this elderly population is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the early and late outcomes of three distinct aortic root replacement techniques in patients aged 70 and above.
- To assess the impact of mechanical composite grafts, biological composite grafts, and valve sparing aortic root reimplantation on patient survival and complications.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 95 patients (mean age 73.8 years) were divided into three groups: mechanical composite graft (MECH), customized biological composite graft (BIO), and valve sparing aortic root reimplantation (REIMPL).
- Aortic arch replacement was performed in 42.1% of patients.
- Follow-up was completed in 95.2% of in-hospital survivors.
Main Results:
- Hospital mortality was significantly lower in the REIMPL group (0%) compared to MECH (15.7%) and BIO (19.7%) groups (p=0.004).
- Prolonged mechanical ventilation was more frequent in the BIO group (36.4%) than REIMPL (4.5%) and MECH (7%) groups (p=0.013).
- Late mortality was significantly lower in the REIMPL group (4.5%) compared to MECH (34.8%) and BIO (16.7%) groups (p=0.012) over a mean follow-up of 41 months.
Conclusions:
- Valve sparing aortic root reimplantation (David I) is a safe and effective surgical option for septuagenarians requiring aortic root replacement.
- This technique is associated with significantly reduced early and late morbidity and mortality compared to composite graft replacements.
- The procedure leads to significant improvements in postoperative New York Heart Association class and performance status.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests

