Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Real-time Pressure-volume Analysis of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Mice
Published on: July 2, 2018
Computational analysis of the effect of the type of LVAD flow on coronary perfusion and ventricular afterload
Ki Moo Lim1, In Su Kim, Seong Wook Choi
1Department of Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering, Kangwon National University, Hyoja-dong, Chuncheon, Gangwon-do, Republic of Korea.
Insights
A pulsatile left ventricular assist device (LVAD) in counter-pulsation mode enhances coronary blood flow and reduces left ventricular pressure, aiding cardiac recovery. This mode offers a promising alternative to continuous-flow LVADs for improved cardiovascular physiology.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Physiology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Computational Modeling
Background:
- Heart failure significantly impacts cardiovascular hemodynamics.
- Left Ventricular Assist Devices (LVADs) are crucial for managing advanced heart failure.
- Optimizing LVAD function is essential for patient outcomes and cardiac recovery.
Purpose of the Study:
- To computationally model and investigate the hemodynamic effects of pulsatile LVADs.
- To compare the physiological impact of different LVAD flow modes (co-pulsation, counter-pulsation, continuous flow).
- To evaluate LVAD influence on coronary perfusion and left ventricular pressure in a failing heart model.
Main Methods:
- Development of a 16-compartment computational cardiovascular model, including coronary circulation and autonomic control.
- Simulation of cardiac failure by reducing ventricular elastance and contractility.
- Assessment of LVAD hemodynamic performance across co-pulsation, counter-pulsation, and continuous flow modes.
Main Results:
- Pulsatile LVAD in counter-pulsation mode demonstrated the most physiological coronary blood perfusion.
- Counter-pulsation mode significantly reduced peak left ventricular pressure compared to other modes.
- Reduced ventricular afterload in counter-pulsation mode supports potential cardiac recovery.
Conclusions:
- Pulsatile LVADs, particularly in counter-pulsation mode, offer significant physiological advantages.
- Counter-pulsation mode presents a viable alternative to continuous-flow LVADs for improving cardiovascular function.
- Computational modeling provides valuable insights into optimizing LVAD therapy for heart failure management.
Abstract:
We developed a computational model to investigate the hemodynamic effects of a pulsatile left ventricular assist device (LVAD) on the cardiovascular system. The model consisted of 16 compartments for the cardiovascular system, including coronary circulation and LVAD, and autonomic nervous system control. A failed heart was modeled by decreasing the end-systolic elastance of the ventricle and blocking the mechanism controlling heart contractility. We assessed the physiological effect of the LVAD on the cardiovascular system for three types of LVAD flow: co-pulsation, counter-pulsation, and continuous flow modes. The results indicated that the pulsatile LVAD with counter-pulsation mode gave the most physiological coronary blood perfusion. In addition, the counter-pulsation mode resulted in a lower peak pressure of the left ventricle than the other modes, aiding cardiac recovery by reducing the ventricular afterload. In conclusion, these results indicate that, from the perspective of cardiovascular physiology, a pulsatile LVAD with counter-pulsation operation is a plausible alternative to the existing LVAD with continuous flow mode.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Output II: Effect of Stroke Volume on Cardiac Output
Preload
Preload refers to the initial elongation of the cardiac myocytes before contraction and is related to the volume of blood filling the heart at the end of diastole, or end-diastolic volume. The...
Pathophysiology of Cardiac Performance

