Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

Introduction to Solid Supported Membrane Based Electrophysiology
Published on: May 11, 2013
The high and low affinity transport systems for dipeptides in kidney brush border membrane respond differently to
H Daniel1, E L Morse, S A Adibi
1Clinical Nutrition Unit, Montefiore University Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213.
Abstract:
The principal aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of variation in proton gradient and membrane potential on the transport of glycyl-L-glutamine (Gly-Gln) by renal brush border membrane vesicles. Under our conditions of transport assay, Gly-Gln was taken up by brush border membrane vesicles almost entirely as intact dipeptide. This uptake was mediated by two transporters shared by other dipeptides and characterized as the high affinity (Kt = 44.1 +/- 11.2 microM)/low capacity (Vmax = 0.41 +/- 0.03 nmol/mg protein/5 s) and low affinity (Kt = 2.62 +/- 0.50 mM)/high capacity (Vmax 4.04 +/- 0.80 nmol/mg protein/5 s) transporters. In the absence of a pH gradient, only the low affinity system was operational, but with a reduced transport capacity. Imposing a pH gradient of 1.6 pH units increased the Vmax of both transporters. Kinetic analysis of the rates of Gly-Gln uptake as a function of external pH revealed Hill coefficients of close or equal to 1, indicating that transporters contain only one binding site for the interaction with external H+. The effects of membrane potential on Gly-Gln uptake were investigated with valinomycin-induced K+ diffusion potentials. The velocity of the high affinity system but not of the low affinity system increased linearly with increasing inside-negative K+ diffusion potentials (p less than 0.01). The Kt of neither system was affected by alterations in either pH gradient or membrane potential. We conclude that (a) the high affinity transporter is far more sensitive to changes in proton gradient and membrane potential than the low affinity transporter and (b) in the presence of a pH gradient, transport of each dipeptide molecule requires cotransport of one hydrogen ion to serve as the driving force.
More Related Videos
11:51Application of Electrophysiology Measurement to Study the Activity of Electro-Neutral Transporters
Published on: February 3, 2018
04:40Demonstration of Membrane Transport of Histidine using Goat Intestinal Inverted Sacs: An Experiential Pedagogical Tool for Undergraduates
Published on: October 4, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Primary Active Transport
Primary Active Transport
Drug Absorption Mechanism: Passive Membrane Transport
Drug Elimination by Renal Route: Tubular Secretion
Pore Transport and Ion-Pair Transport
Pore transport, also known as convective transport, is a process where small molecules like urea, water, and sugars rapidly cross cell membranes as though there were channels or pores in the membrane. Although direct microscopic evidence is limited but the concept of pores or channels is widely accepted based on physiological evidence. Despite the lack of direct microscopic...
Carrier-Mediated Transport
Active transport involves two types of membrane-spanning transporters: uptake and efflux. Uptake transporters are expressed in the small...