Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...

Constraints and Statical Determinacy

Constraints and Statical Determinacy

In structural engineering, the equilibrium of a system is not only determined by its equations of equilibrium but also with the help of constraints. Constraints refer to restrictions on the motion of a system. The proper combinations of constraints can minimize the total number of constraints needed to maintain a system in mechanical equilibrium. When this happens, the system is said to be statically determinate. For such systems, the unknown reaction supports can be estimated using equilibrium...

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this particular...

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:

Second Uniqueness Theorem

Second Uniqueness Theorem

Consider a region consisting of several individual conductors with a definite charge density in the region between these conductors. The second uniqueness theorem states that if the total charge on each conductor and the charge density in the in-between region are known, then the electric field can be uniquely determined.
In contrast, consider that the electric field is non-unique and apply Gauss's law in divergence form in the region between the conductors and the integral form to the surface...

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

The measurement postulates of quantum mechanics are operationally redundant.

Nature communications·2019

Same author

Finite-bath corrections to the second law of thermodynamics.

Physical review. E·2018

Same author

A general derivation and quantification of the third law of thermodynamics.

Nature communications·2017

Same author

Certified randomness in quantum physics.

Nature·2016

Same author

Work extraction from quantum systems with bounded fluctuations in work.

Nature communications·2016

Same author

Full randomness from arbitrarily deterministic events.

Nature communications·2013

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Universally composable privacy amplification from causality constraints.

Lluís Masanes¹

¹ICFO-Institut de Ciencies Fotoniques, Mediterranean Technology Parck, 08860 Castelldefels (Barcelona), Spain.

Physical Review Letters

|April 28, 2009

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study proves the security of secret key distribution schemes using Bell inequality violations. The proof ensures secure communication even if quantum devices are untrusted, relying only on the no-signaling principle.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

Quantum Information Science
Quantum Cryptography
Foundations of Physics

Background:

Secret key distribution is crucial for secure communication.
Correlations violating Bell inequalities offer novel resources for cryptography.
Existing security proofs often rely on the full validity of quantum mechanics.

Purpose of the Study:

To provide the first universally composable security proof for secret key distribution schemes utilizing Bell inequality violations.
To establish a security framework that does not depend on the trustworthiness of quantum devices.
To demonstrate secure communication protocols based on fundamental physical principles rather than device-specific assumptions.

Main Methods:

Utilizing correlations that violate Bell inequalities as a cryptographic resource.
Developing a security proof based on the universally composable (UC) security definition.
Employing the principle of no-faster-than-light signaling as the sole security assumption.

Main Results:

The first universally composable security proof for Bell inequality-based secret key distribution is presented.
The security is guaranteed even when participants distrust their quantum devices.
The proof relies solely on the impossibility of faster-than-light signaling.

Conclusions:

Secret key distribution schemes leveraging Bell inequality violations are provably secure under the strongest security definition.
These schemes offer robust security guarantees independent of the internal workings or trustworthiness of quantum devices.
The findings enable secure communication in scenarios where quantum device integrity is uncertain, relying on fundamental physics principles.