Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026
Three-Dimensionally Printed Microfluidic Cross-flow System for Ultrafiltration/Nanofiltration Membrane Performance Testing
Published on: February 13, 2016
Effect of increasing dialyzer mass transfer area coefficient and dialysate flow on clearance of protein-bound
Frank J-G Luo1, Kajal P Patel, Ilian O Marquez
1Department of Medicine, VA Palo Alto HCS and Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94303, USA. frankluo_za@yahoo.com
Background:
Protein-bound solutes are poorly cleared by means of conventional hemodialysis because protein binding limits the "free" solute concentration driving diffusion. This study tested the modeled prediction that clearances of bound solutes could be increased by increasing the dialyzer mass transfer area coefficient (K(o)A) and dialysate flow (Q(d)) to greater than the levels used in conventional practice.
Study Design:
Pilot crossover trial.
Setting & Participants:
6 stable long-term hemodialysis patients.
Intervention:
Study participants underwent an experimental dialysis treatment in which K(o)A and Q(d) were increased by using 2 dialyzers in series and supplying each dialyzer with a Q(d) of 800 mL/min by using 2 dialysis machines. Experimental clearances were compared with those during a conventional treatment with a single dialyzer and Q(d) of 800 mL/min supplied by 1 machine.
Outcomes:
Measured clearances of uremic solutes.
Measurements:
Clearances were measured for urea nitrogen and the bound solutes p-cresol sulfate, indoxyl sulfate, kynurenic acid, and hippurate.
Results:
Clearances for the bound solutes during conventional treatment were lower than for urea nitrogen (clearance values: urea nitrogen, 255 +/- 16 mL/min; p-cresol sulfate, 23 +/- 4 mL/min; indoxyl sulfate, 30 +/- 7 mL/min; kynurenic acid, 43 +/- 4 mL/min; and hippurate, 115 +/- 11 mL/min). Experimental treatment increased clearances of all solutes (clearance values: urea nitrogen, 318 +/- 19 mL/min; p-cresol sulfate, 37 +/- 6 mL/min; indoxyl sulfate, 46 +/- 8 mL/min; kynurenic acid, 73 +/- 7 mL/min; and hippurate, 165 +/- 17 mL/min). The magnitude of the increases in clearance was greater for bound solutes than for urea nitrogen (increase in clearance: urea nitrogen, 25% +/- 6%; p-cresol sulfate, 66% +/- 19%; indoxyl sulfate, 57% +/- 27%; kynurenic acid, 69% +/- 5%; and hippurate, 44% +/- 15%).
Limitations:
A longer term study would be required to determine whether increased dialytic clearance of bound solutes leads to a decrease in plasma solute levels.
Conclusions:
Dialytic clearance of protein-bound solutes can be increased by increasing K(o)A and Q(d) to greater than conventional levels.
Related Concept Videos
01:15Dialysis
01:31Factors Affecting Renal Clearance: Drug's Physicochemical Properties and Plasma Levels
One important factor is the drug's molecular size. The kidneys readily excrete smaller molecules below 300 Daltons (Da). On the other hand, molecules weighing between 300 and 500 Da are excreted through both urine and bile. Larger molecules above 500 Da tend to be excreted less...
01:09Hepatic Drug Clearance: Effect of Protein Binding
For low-extraction-ratio drugs that are less than 80% protein-bound, minor changes in protein binding...
01:06Renal Drug Clearance: Overview
Renal clearance can be calculated using different methods. One approach is to divide the urinary drug excretion rate by the plasma drug concentration. This method directly measures renal clearance, indicating the kidneys' efficiency in...
01:25Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Dose Adjustments Based on Drug Clearance and Elimination Rate Constant
01:30Peritoneal Dialysis I: Introduction and Procedure