Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
Published on: November 26, 2015
Normative foundations of technology transfer and transnational benefit principles in the UNESCO Universal Declaration
Thomas Alured Faunce1, Hitoshi Nasu
1ANU College of Law, The Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia. thomas.faunce@anu.edu.au
Abstract:
The United Nations Scientific, Education, and Cultural Organization Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (UDBHR) expresses in its title and substance a controversial linkage of two normative systems: international human rights law and bioethics. The UDBHR has the status of what is known as a "nonbinding" declaration under public international law. The UDBHR's foundation within bioethics (and association, e.g., with virtue-based or principlist bioethical theories) is more problematic. Nonetheless, the UDBHR contains socially important principles of technology transfer and transnational benefit (articles 14, 15, and 21). This paper is one of the first to explore how the disciplines of bioethics and international human rights law may interact in the UDBHR to advance the policy relevance and health impact of such principles. It investigates their normative ancestry in the UDBHR, as well as relevant conceptual differences between bioethics and public international law in this respect, and how these may be relevant to their conceptual evolution and application.
Related Concept Videos
Ethics and Bioethics
Biodiversity and Human Values
Types of Genetic Transfer Between Organisms
Types of Genetic Transfer Between Organisms
What is Genetic Engineering?
Plant Breeding and Biotechnology