Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Establishment of the Dual Humanized TK-NOG Mouse Model for HIV-associated Liver Pathogenesis
Published on: September 11, 2019
Is recurrent hepatitis C worse with living donors?
Alexander Kuo1, Norah A Terrault
1Division of Gastroenterology, University of California, San Diego, 200 West Arbor Drive M/C 8413, San Diego, CA 92103, USA. alkuo@ucsd.edu
Insights
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence after liver transplant is similar for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). Recent studies show no difference in graft survival or fibrosis progression, supporting LDLT use.
Area of Science:
- Hepatology
- Transplantation Immunology
- Virology
Background:
- Early studies suggested increased hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence severity in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) recipients versus deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT).
- This led to uncertainty regarding the use of live donors for HCV patients.
- This review addresses the comparative severity of recurrent HCV in LDLT versus DDLT.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate whether recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is more severe in liver transplant recipients who received organs from living donors compared to deceased donors.
- To clarify the role of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in patients with HCV.
Main Methods:
- Review of recently published studies comparing outcomes of LDLT and DDLT in HCV-positive recipients.
- Analysis of data on patient and graft survival.
- Assessment of fibrosis progression using protocol liver biopsies.
Main Results:
- Recent studies contradict earlier findings of inferior survival in LDLT recipients.
- The Adult-to-Adult Live Donor Liver Transplant Cohort Study indicated similar patient and graft survival for HCV-positive LDLT and DDLT recipients with experienced centers.
- No significant difference in fibrosis progression was observed between LDLT and DDLT groups.
Conclusions:
- Graft survival and fibrosis progression are comparable between LDLT and DDLT recipients up to 5 years post-transplant.
- Current data support the use of LDLT as a viable additional donor source for liver transplantation in HCV patients.
Purpose Of Review:
Early reports suggested that hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection recurred with greater severity in recipients of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) compared with recipients of deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). Consequently, there has been uncertainty in the transplant community as to whether to encourage use of live donors for patients undergoing transplantation for HCV. This review will present the current data regarding whether recurrent HCV is worse with living donors.
Recent Findings:
More recently published studies have not corroborated the results of earlier studies showing inferior graft and patient survival in recipients of LDLT. The Adult-to-Adult Live Donor Liver Transplant Cohort Study showed that patient and graft survival in HCV-positive LDLT recipients was similar to that in DDLT recipients once centers had experience with LDLT. Additionally, studies using protocol liver biopsies to assess disease severity found no significant difference in the rate of fibrosis progression between recipients of LDLT and DDLT.
Summary:
There is no difference in graft survival or fibrosis progression between recipients of LDLT compared with DDLT with follow-up periods up to 5 years. Available data support the use of LDLT as an additional donor source for these patients.
Related Concept Videos
Hepatitis
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction
Viral Hepatitis I: Introduction
Bone Marrow Sampling and Transplants
The transplant begins with high doses of chemotherapy and radiation treatment, which aim to destroy the...
Tissue Transplantation
The Biology of Tissue Transplantation
The biology of tissue transplantation hinges on the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) molecules. These molecules...
Cytomegalovirus Disease
