Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

04:59
Using a Knee Arthrometer to Evaluate Tissue-specific Contributions to Knee Flexion Contracture in the Rat
Published on: November 9, 2018
Review article: Validity of the KT-1000 knee ligament arthrometer
1Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery (Hong Kong)
|April 29, 2009
Summary
The KT-1000 knee arthrometer can help assess anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. However, its diagnostic accuracy is limited, suggesting cautious use and a specific comparative measurement method for better results.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Sports Medicine
- Biomechanics
Background:
- The KT-1000 knee arthrometer is utilized for quantifying anterior tibial translation.
- This measurement is crucial for evaluating anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) integrity and guiding reconstruction outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically evaluate the diagnostic validity of the KT-1000 for assessing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries.
- To determine the reliability and appropriate application of the KT-1000 as an objective diagnostic tool.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search was conducted using Medline for studies published between 1950 and 2007.
- Studies were analyzed for their methodologies and reported diagnostic accuracy metrics (sensitivities, specificities, predictive values).
- Focus was placed on studies providing interpretable data for validating the KT-1000's clinical utility.
Main Results:
- Only one of the four identified studies provided sufficient interpretable data to validate the KT-1000 as a diagnostic tool for ACL injuries.
- Three studies exhibited significant methodological limitations, compromising the reliability of their findings.
- The KT-1000's direct measurement of anterior tibial motion showed variable diagnostic performance.
Conclusions:
- The KT-1000 knee arthrometer should be used with caution as a standalone objective diagnostic instrument for ACL injuries.
- A modified approach, calculating the difference in anterior tibial motion between the injured and uninjured knees, may offer improved diagnostic utility.
- A threshold of 2-3 mm difference may serve as a more appropriate cutoff for a dichotomous diagnostic test in ACL assessment.
