Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Free-field release from masking.

K Saberi1, L Dostal, T Sadralodabai

  • 1Psychoacoustics Laboratory, California State University, Los Angeles 90032.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|September 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Beta-amyloid peptides(1-42) and (1-40) in the cerebrospinal fluid during pregnancy: a prospective observational study.

Archives of women's mental health·2020
Same author

Cochlear and neural delays for coincidence detection in owls.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2001
Same author

A level of stimulus representation model for auditory detection and attention.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2001
Same author

A short formal synthesis of squalamine from a microbial metabolite.

Organic letters·2000
Same author

Neural bases of an auditory illusion and its elimination in owls.

Nature neuroscience·1999
Same author

Cognitive restoration of reversed speech.

Nature·1999
Same journal

High-resolution depth estimation for multiple wideband sources in deep sea via sparse Bayesian learninga).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Depression markers in speech: An approach based on tract variables dynamics.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The oyster toadfish (Opsanus tau) alters active and diurnal calling amid vessel noise in New York City.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Experimental noise characterisation of phase-locked tandem-rotor in edgewise flight.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The tune-text-temporal synergy: Prosodic effects of final segmental weakening in Neapolitan.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Monitoring vessel movement above critical offshore infrastructure using distributed acoustic sensing.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
See all related articles

Spatial separation significantly impacts auditory masking release. This study investigated how varying signal and masker locations affects masking-level differences (MLDs), finding maximum MLDs of 15 dB horizontally and 8 dB vertically.

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Perception
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Spatial Hearing

Background:

  • Understanding auditory masking is crucial for hearing science.
  • Spatial release from masking describes how sound source location affects audibility.
  • Masking-level differences (MLDs) quantify this effect.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate free-field release from masking.
  • To examine the influence of spatial separation between signal and masker on MLDs.
  • To measure MLDs across horizontal and vertical planes, and under monaural conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a two-interval, forced-choice (2IFC) adaptive paradigm.
  • Employed a click train signal and broadband white noise masker.
  • Measured masked and absolute thresholds for various signal and masker source locations in free-field and monaural conditions.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Maximum MLDs of 15 dB were observed along the horizontal plane.
  • Maximum MLDs of 8 dB were observed along vertical planes.
  • Monaural conditions yielded maximum MLDs of 9 dB.

Conclusions:

  • Spatial separation between signal and masker is a significant factor in auditory masking release.
  • The extent of masking release varies depending on the spatial configuration (horizontal, vertical, monaural).
  • Findings contribute to understanding binaural hearing and sound localization mechanisms.