Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Eyewitness Memory01:22

Eyewitness Memory

Eyewitness memory refers to the recollection of events by someone who has directly witnessed them, often serving as critical evidence in legal settings. This type of memory is commonly used in criminal cases where a witness describes details like a suspect's appearance, clothing, or behavior during a crime. However, despite its perceived reliability, eyewitness memory is prone to significant errors.
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function like a...
Actor-Observer Effect01:23

Actor-Observer Effect

The actor-observer effect, a cognitive bias closely linked to the fundamental attribution error, refers to the tendency for individuals to attribute their behavior to external, situational factors while explaining others’ behavior in terms of internal, dispositional traits. This asymmetry in attribution significantly influences social perception and judgment.Cognitive Mechanisms Behind the EffectTwo primary psychological mechanisms contribute to the actor-observer effect: differences in visual...
Correspondence Bias01:17

Correspondence Bias

Correspondence bias, also referred to as the fundamental attribution error, describes the tendency to attribute another person’s behavior to internal characteristics rather than situational influences. This cognitive bias leads individuals to overlook external factors that may be influencing actions, thereby fostering potentially inaccurate assessments of others’ intentions and dispositions.Empirical Evidence for Correspondence BiasResearch has consistently demonstrated the prevalence of...
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is called the fundamental attribution...
Halo Effect01:27

Halo Effect

The halo effect is a cognitive bias in which an individual's overall impression influences judgments about their specific traits. This psychological phenomenon leads people to associate positive characteristics with those they perceive as generally good and negative characteristics with those they view as bad. This effect is particularly influential in social perception, professional evaluations, and decision-making processes.The Psychological Basis of the Halo EffectThe halo effect is rooted...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Biased lineups and additional repetitions exacerbate the repeated-suspect effect.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2025
Same author

Perceptions of "Stealthing" in Civil Court.

Violence against women·2025
Same author

Beyond the confidence-accuracy relation: A multiple-reflector-variable approach to postdicting accuracy on eyewitness lineups.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2025
Same author

Legal Decision-Making in an Adult Rape Case Involving DNA Evidence.

Violence against women·2024
Same author

Eyewitness confidence and decision time reflect identification accuracy in actual police lineups.

Law and human behavior·2023
Same author

The truth about snitches: an archival analysis of informant testimony.

Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

Is manipulative intent necessary to mitigate the eyewitness post-identification feedback effect?

Deah S Quinlivan1, Gary L Wells, Jeffrey S Neuschatz

  • 1Department of Psychology, Iowa State University, West 112 Lagomarcino, Ames, IA 50011, USA. dslawson@iastate.edu

Law and Human Behavior
|April 29, 2009
PubMed
Summary

Eyewitness certainty can be swayed by feedback, but suspicion about the feedback source reduces this effect. Even without manipulative intent, informing witnesses of potential errors can improve testimony accuracy.

More Related Videos

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory
08:06

Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory

Published on: August 15, 2010

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory
08:06

Eye Movement Monitoring of Memory

Published on: August 15, 2010

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Forensic Psychology

Background:

  • Eyewitness testimony is crucial in legal proceedings.
  • Feedback after identification can distort witness certainty and memory recall.
  • Previous research identified a 'post-feedback suspicion' effect mitigating these distortions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the factors influencing the post-feedback suspicion effect.
  • To determine if manipulative intent is necessary for the feedback effect mitigation.
  • To explore the malleability of retrospective eyewitness judgments.

Main Methods:

  • Replication of the post-feedback suspicion effect.
  • Introduction of a 'mistake' condition without manipulative intent.
  • Inclusion of conditions with processing instructions for feedback.
  • Assessment of retrospective judgments like certainty, attention, and view.

Main Results:

  • The post-feedback suspicion effect was replicated.
  • Manipulative intent was found not to be a necessary component for mitigating feedback effects.
  • Processing instructions did not significantly mitigate the feedback effect.
  • Retrospective eyewitness judgments were shown to be malleable.

Conclusions:

  • The mitigation of feedback effects on eyewitness testimony does not solely rely on perceived manipulative intent.
  • Eyewitness judgments remain susceptible to new information, highlighting the potential for interventions.
  • Understanding these effects is critical for improving the reliability of eyewitness accounts in legal contexts.