Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Cell-free Biochemical Fluorometric Enzymatic Assay for High-throughput Measurement of Lipid Peroxidation in High Density Lipoprotein
Published on: October 12, 2017
Oxidized LDL, lipoprotein (a) and other emergent risk factors in acute myocardial infarction (FORTIAM study)
Miquel Gómez1, Vicente Valle, Fernando Arós
1Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital del Mar, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Insights
A small percentage of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients lack traditional risk factors. Elevated lipoprotein (a) and oxidized low-density lipoprotein levels independently predict poorer prognosis in AMI patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Biomarkers
- Risk Factor Analysis
Background:
- Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) often presents with classical risk factors.
- Understanding AMI in patients without these factors is crucial for comprehensive risk assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the prevalence of AMI without classical risk factors.
- To identify emergent risk factors and their impact on 6-month prognosis in AMI patients.
Main Methods:
- Multicenter cohort study (FORTIAM) of 1371 AMI patients.
- Assessed classical risk factors and emergent markers: lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)], oxidized low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL).
- Follow-up for death, angina, and re-infarction over 6 months.
Main Results:
- 8.0% of AMI patients lacked classical risk factors; prognosis was similar.
- Elevated Lp(a) (>60 mg/dL) and oxLDL (>74 U/L) were independently associated with poorer 6-month prognosis.
- Hazard ratios for Lp(a) and oxLDL were 1.40 and 1.48, respectively, adjusted for confounders.
Conclusions:
- The proportion of AMI patients without traditional risk factors is low.
- Emergent risk factors, specifically Lp(a) and oxLDL, significantly predict adverse outcomes in AMI.
- These biomarkers offer prognostic value irrespective of classical risk factor status.
Introduction And Objectives:
To determine the prevalence of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) without classical risk factors, and to ascertain whether affected patients exhibit a higher prevalence of emergent risk factors and whether the presence of specific emergent risk factors influence prognosis at 6 months.
Methods:
The FORTIAM (Factores Ocultos de Riesgo Tras un Infarto Agudo de Miocardio) study is a multicenter cohort study that includes 1371 AMI patients who were admitted within 24 hours of symptom onset. Strict definitions were used for classical risk factors and the concentrations of the following markers were determined: lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)], oxidized low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, homocysteine and antibody to Chlamydia. The end-points observed during the 6-month follow-up were death, angina and re-infarction.
Results:
The prevalence of AMI without classical risk factors was 8.0%. The absence of classical risk factors did not affect the 6-month prognosis. The only emergent risk factors independently associated with a poorer prognosis were the Lp(a) and oxLDL concentrations. Cut-points were determined using smoothing splines: 60 mg/ dL for Lp(a) and 74 U/L for oxLDL. The associated hazard ratios, adjusted for age, sex and classical risk factors, were 1.40 (95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.84 ) and 1.48 (95% confidence interval, 1.06-2.06), respectively.
Conclusions:
The proportion of AMI patients without classical risk factors was low and their prognosis was similar to that in other AMI patients. Both oxLDL and Lp(a) concentrations were independently associated with a poorer 6-month prognosis, irrespective of the presence of classical risk factors.
Related Concept Videos
Atherosclerosis I: Introduction
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies