Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

A Simple Bioassay for the Evaluation of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors
Published on: March 15, 2016
Cellular source and amount of vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor in tumors
Barbara Sennino1, Frank Kuhnert, Sebastien P Tabruyn
1Cardiovascular Research Institute, Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Department of Anatomy, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0452, USA. barbara.sennino@ucsf.edu
Abstract:
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), and their receptors are important targets in cancer therapy based on angiogenesis inhibition. However, it is unclear whether inhibition of VEGF and PDGF together is more effective than inhibition of either one alone. Here, we used two contrasting tumor models to compare the effects of inhibiting VEGF or PDGF alone, by adenovirally generated soluble receptors, to the effects of inhibiting both together. In RIP-Tag2 tumors, VEGF and PDGF inhibition together reduced tumor vascularity and abundance of pericytes. However, VEGF inhibition reduced tumor vascularity without decreasing pericyte density, and PDGF inhibition reduced pericytes without reducing tumor vascularity. By contrast, in Lewis lung carcinomas (LLC), inhibition of VEGF or PDGF reduced blood vessels and pericytes to the same extent as did inhibition of both together. Similar results were obtained using tyrosine kinase inhibitors AG-013736 and imatinib. In LLC, VEGF expression was largely restricted to pericytes and PDGF was largely restricted to endothelial cells, but, in RIP-Tag2 tumors, expression of both growth factors was more widespread and significantly greater than in LLC. These findings suggest that inhibition of PDGF in LLC reduced pericytes, and then tumor vessels regressed because pericytes were the main source of VEGF. The vasculature of RIP-Tag2 tumors, in which most VEGF is from tumor cells, was more resistant to PDGF inhibition. The findings emphasize the interdependence of pericytes and endothelial cells in tumors and the importance of tumor phenotype in determining the cellular effects of VEGF and PDGF inhibitors on tumor vessels.
Insights
Simultaneous inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) shows varied efficacy. Tumor type significantly impacts whether combined VEGF and PDGF inhibition is more effective than targeting either alone.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Cancer Biology
- Angiogenesis Research
Background:
- Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) signaling pathways are critical regulators of tumor angiogenesis.
- Targeting VEGF and PDGF is a key strategy in anti-cancer therapies aimed at inhibiting tumor blood vessel formation.
- The comparative efficacy of combined versus single inhibition of VEGF and PDGF remains incompletely understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effects of inhibiting VEGF alone, PDGF alone, and both VEGF and PDGF together on tumor vascularity and pericyte density.
- To investigate the influence of distinct tumor microenvironments and growth factor expression patterns on the response to anti-angiogenic therapy.
Main Methods:
- Utilized two contrasting tumor models: RIP-Tag2 and Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC).
- Employed adenovirally generated soluble receptors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (AG-013736, imatinib) to inhibit VEGF and/or PDGF.
- Assessed tumor vascularity, pericyte density, and growth factor expression patterns (VEGF, PDGF) within the tumor models.
Main Results:
- In RIP-Tag2 tumors, combined inhibition reduced vascularity and pericytes; however, single VEGF inhibition primarily affected vascularity, and single PDGF inhibition affected pericytes.
- In LLC, single inhibition of VEGF or PDGF yielded similar reductions in vessels and pericytes as combined inhibition.
- Differential expression of VEGF and PDGF in LLC (pericytes and endothelial cells, respectively) versus RIP-Tag2 tumors (more widespread) correlated with observed therapeutic responses.
Conclusions:
- The effectiveness of combined VEGF and PDGF inhibition is dependent on the specific tumor model and its underlying growth factor expression profile.
- Tumor pericytes play a crucial role in maintaining tumor vasculature, particularly in models where they are a primary source of VEGF.
- These findings highlight the interdependence of tumor endothelial cells and pericytes and underscore the importance of tumor phenotype in guiding anti-angiogenic therapy strategies.
More Related Videos
09:03Monitoring Functionality and Morphology of Vasculature Recruited by Factors Secreted by Fast-growing Tumor-generating Cells
Published on: November 23, 2014
12:09A Novel High-resolution In vivo Imaging Technique to Study the Dynamic Response of Intracranial Structures to Tumor Growth and Therapeutics
Published on: June 16, 2013
Related Concept Videos
Regulation of Angiogenesis and Blood Supply
Mechanism of Angiogenesis
Mitogens and the Cell Cycle
The Tumor Microenvironment
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
mTOR Signaling and Cancer Progression
The mTOR pathway or the...