Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Karyotyping

Karyotyping

Describing the number and physical features of chromosomes can reveal abnormalities that underlie genetic diseases. This description is facilitated by special staining techniques that produce a particular banding pattern on each chromosome. State-of-the-art techniques make this approach even more powerful, enabling the detection of individual genes that cause disease.A Simple Chromosome Staining Technique Provides Valuable Scientific InsightSome genetic diseases can be detected by looking at...

Fixation and Sectioning

Fixation and Sectioning

Two basic types of preparation are used to visualize specimens with a light microscope: wet mounts and fixed specimens.
The simplest type of preparation is the wet mount, in which the specimen is placed in a drop of liquid on the slide. A liquid specimen can be directly deposited on the slide using a dropper. Solid specimens, such as skin scraping, can be placed on the slide before adding a drop of liquid to prepare the wet mount. Sometimes the liquid is simply water, but stains are often added...

Differential Staining Technique

Differential Staining Technique

Differential staining is an essential microbiological technique that exploits variations in cell wall structures to classify and identify microorganisms. It facilitates the distinction of bacteria, aiding in diagnostic and research applications. Two of the most widely used differential staining methods are Gram staining and acid-fast staining, both of which rely on the chemical and structural differences in bacterial cell walls.Gram Staining TechniqueGram staining differentiates bacteria by...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

The karyometric signature is altered in fallopian tubes with serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma.

Gynecologic oncology·2024

Same author

Concurrent Chemotherapy and Pelvic Radiation Therapy Compared With Pelvic Radiation Therapy Alone as Adjuvant Therapy After Radical Surgery in High-Risk Early-Stage Cancer of the Cervix.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·2023

Same author

Lifestyle intervention in ovarian cancer enhanced survival (LIVES) study (NRG/GOG0225): Recruitment, retention and baseline characteristics of a randomized trial of diet and physical activity in ovarian cancer survivors.

Gynecologic oncology·2023

Same author

Sub-millimeter endoscope demonstrates feasibility of in vivo reflectance imaging, fluorescence imaging, and cell collection in the fallopian tubes.

Journal of biomedical optics·2021

Same author

GOG 244 - The Lymphedema and Gynecologic cancer (LeG) study: The impact of lower-extremity lymphedema on quality of life, psychological adjustment, physical disability, and function.

Gynecologic oncology·2020

Same author

GOG 244-The lymphedema and gynecologic cancer (LEG) study: Incidence and risk factors in newly diagnosed patients.

Gynecologic oncology·2019

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Generating and Analyzing High-Parameter Histology Images with Histoflow Cytometry

Generating and Analyzing High-Parameter Histology Images with Histoflow Cytometry

Published on: June 21, 2024

Karyometry: correction algorithm for differences in staining.

Peter H Bartels¹, Hubert G Bartels, David S Alberts

¹College of Optical Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA. hubertbartels@msn.com

Analytical and Quantitative Cytology and Histology

|May 1, 2009

Summary

This study introduces a pixel-by-pixel algorithm to correct histopathology staining variations while preserving nuclear chromatin texture. The method ensures accurate karyometric analysis by minimizing staining-related artifacts in digital images.

More Related Videos

Optimized Staining and Proliferation Modeling Methods for Cell Division Monitoring using Cell Tracking Dyes

Optimized Staining and Proliferation Modeling Methods for Cell Division Monitoring using Cell Tracking Dyes

Published on: December 13, 2012

Mapping Absolute DNA Density in Cell Nuclei using Single-molecule Localization Microscopy

Mapping Absolute DNA Density in Cell Nuclei using Single-molecule Localization Microscopy

Published on: November 11, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Generating and Analyzing High-Parameter Histology Images with Histoflow Cytometry

Generating and Analyzing High-Parameter Histology Images with Histoflow Cytometry

Published on: June 21, 2024

Optimized Staining and Proliferation Modeling Methods for Cell Division Monitoring using Cell Tracking Dyes

Optimized Staining and Proliferation Modeling Methods for Cell Division Monitoring using Cell Tracking Dyes

Published on: December 13, 2012

Mapping Absolute DNA Density in Cell Nuclei using Single-molecule Localization Microscopy

Mapping Absolute DNA Density in Cell Nuclei using Single-molecule Localization Microscopy

Published on: November 11, 2025

Area of Science:

Digital Pathology
Histopathology Image Analysis
Computational Pathology

Background:

Histopathologic sections often exhibit staining variations.
These variations can significantly impact quantitative image analysis, particularly karyometry.
Preserving nuclear chromatin texture is crucial for accurate diagnostic interpretation.

Purpose of the Study:

To present a novel algorithm for correcting staining differences in histopathologic images.
To ensure the preservation of nuclear chromatin texture during image correction.
To enable reliable karyometric analysis despite staining variability.

Main Methods:

A pixel-by-pixel correction approach is employed.
Pixel values are mapped to cumulative frequency distributions.
Image data is standardized using a reference dataset's distribution.

Main Results:

The algorithm effectively corrects staining differences, reducing feature value discrepancies to <1-3%.
Karyometric features in corrected images closely match those of standard imagery.
Minor adjustments may be needed for certain higher-order statistical features.

Conclusions:

The developed algorithm successfully eliminates the impact of minor staining variations on karyometric analysis.
This method enhances the reliability and reproducibility of quantitative histopathology.
It facilitates more accurate and consistent diagnostic assessments.