Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Contingent Leader Identity and Leader Emergence.

Journal of personality·2026
Same author

Understanding the Impact of Personal Resources on Emotional Exhaustion Among Emergency Healthcare Workers: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach.

Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Feasibility and usability study of the ERES: A mobile application to intervene in emotional regulation and self-efficacy in minors with type 1 diabetes.

Digital health·2025
Same author

Capturing shared fNIRS responses to visual affective stimuli in young healthy women.

Biological psychology·2025
Same author

Quest for the optimal venous access in a complex skull base dural fistula: Case illustrations and principles.

Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences·2025
Same author

A social norms campaign based positive intervention aimed at promoting protective behaviours.

Frontiers in public health·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
13:20

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Published on: December 5, 2025

Error affect inoculation for a complex decision-making task.

Carmen Tabernero1, Robert E Wood

  • 1Universidad de Córdoba, Departamento de Psicología, Córdoba, Spain. carmen.tabernero@uco.es

Psicothema
|May 1, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Training police officers to explore options and deliberate improved group decision-making. Error Affect Inoculation (EAI) further enhanced information sharing and decision quality in group tasks.

More Related Videos

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents
07:42

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents

Published on: August 2, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
13:20

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Published on: December 5, 2025

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents
07:42

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents

Published on: August 2, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Organizational Behavior
  • Decision Science

Background:

  • Group decisions are influenced by individual knowledge, theories, and goals.
  • Trainee's cognitive processes, like incremental theory and learning goals, affect decision-making effectiveness.
  • Existing training methods may not fully optimize group decision processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how a trainee's exploratory and deliberate process impacts individual and group decision-making.
  • To compare the effectiveness of Self-Guided Exploration plus Deliberation Process with Error Affect Inoculation (EAI) training.
  • To determine the influence of specific training interventions on group decision quality and information sharing.

Main Methods:

  • 40 Spanish Policemen participated in a training course with two conditions.
  • Condition 1: Self-Guided Exploration plus Deliberation Process (focus on exploring options, testing hypotheses).
  • Condition 2: Error Affect Inoculation (EAI) (focus on positive reactions to errors). Both groups performed individual and group decision-making tasks.

Main Results:

  • Sharing reasoning within groups significantly increases decision quality.
  • The Error Affect Inoculation (EAI) intervention promoted greater information sharing.
  • EAI led to more flexible initial viewpoints and improved the overall quality of group decisions.

Conclusions:

  • Training interventions that encourage exploration and deliberation enhance decision-making.
  • Error Affect Inoculation (EAI) is effective in fostering information sharing and improving group decision quality.
  • Future research should explore broader implications and applications of these training methods.