Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Crossover Experiments01:16

Crossover Experiments

Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
Study Design in Statistics01:15

Study Design in Statistics

A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
Experimental Designs01:16

Experimental Designs

An experimental design is a systematic process that allows researchers to evaluate the relationship between dependent and independent variables. There are three widely used types of experimental design - pre-experimental design, true experimental design, and quasi-experimental design. In pre-experimental design, the researcher compares the data before and after some interventions or treatments. The true-experimental design has more than one purposefully created group, a commonly measured...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Measurement of ethnicity in clinical trials: Delphi survey and consensus statement.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
Same author

Stroke Associated-Infections after Mechanical Thrombectomy: Analysis of the Stroke-Associated INfection afTer Mechanical Thrombectomy (SAINT-MT) study.

Cerebrovascular diseases extra·2026
Same author

Protocol for a SPIRIT extension for reporting pragmatic and explanatory trial protocols designed using the PRECIS tool (SPIRIT-PRECIS).

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same author

SPIRIT 2025 statement: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials.

Lancet (London, England)·2026
Same author

Statistical reviewing for a medical journal: summary of workshop proceedings.

Research integrity and peer review·2026
Same author

SPIRIT-Children and Adolescents (SPIRIT-C) 2026 extension statement: enhancing the reporting and usefulness of paediatric randomised trial protocols.

The Lancet. Child & adolescent health·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Frequency and Distribution of Crossovers in Caenorhabditis elegans Meiosis by SNP Genotyping using Real-time PCR
06:18

Frequency and Distribution of Crossovers in Caenorhabditis elegans Meiosis by SNP Genotyping using Real-time PCR

Published on: July 11, 2025

Design, analysis, and presentation of crossover trials.

Edward J Mills1, An-Wen Chan, Ping Wu

  • 1Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada. millsej@mcmaster.ca

Trials
|May 2, 2009
PubMed
Summary

Reports on crossover trials often lack methodological details. Establishing clear guidelines for conducting and reporting these trials could improve study quality and data reproducibility.

More Related Videos

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study
20:24

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study

Published on: January 31, 2014

Efficient Sampling of Genetically Encoded Biosensor Design Space Enabled with a Design of Experiments and Automation Workflow
08:58

Efficient Sampling of Genetically Encoded Biosensor Design Space Enabled with a Design of Experiments and Automation Workflow

Published on: October 17, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Frequency and Distribution of Crossovers in Caenorhabditis elegans Meiosis by SNP Genotyping using Real-time PCR
06:18

Frequency and Distribution of Crossovers in Caenorhabditis elegans Meiosis by SNP Genotyping using Real-time PCR

Published on: July 11, 2025

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study
20:24

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study

Published on: January 31, 2014

Efficient Sampling of Genetically Encoded Biosensor Design Space Enabled with a Design of Experiments and Automation Workflow
08:58

Efficient Sampling of Genetically Encoded Biosensor Design Space Enabled with a Design of Experiments and Automation Workflow

Published on: October 17, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Biostatistics
  • Evidence-Based Medicine

Background:

  • Crossover trials are widely utilized in clinical research.
  • However, established standards for their analysis and reporting are lacking.
  • This study assesses the methodological quality of published crossover trials.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the methodological aspects and reporting quality of a representative sample of published crossover trials.
  • To identify common deficiencies in the design, analysis, and presentation of crossover trial data.
  • To inform the development of guidelines for improving crossover trial conduct and reporting.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic search of MEDLINE was conducted up to December 2000 to identify randomized crossover trials.
  • Data were independently abstracted in duplicate using predefined criteria for design, analysis, and data presentation.
  • A total of 116 randomized crossover trials were included in the review.

Main Results:

  • The majority of trials focused on drug efficacy (48%) and pharmacokinetic (28%) studies, with a median sample size of 15.
  • Key methodological elements like allocation concealment (17%) and sequence generation (7%) were poorly reported.
  • While most trials used paired data for analysis (93%), only 29% provided sufficient data (CIs or SE) for meta-analysis.

Conclusions:

  • Published reports of crossover trials frequently omit crucial methodological information regarding design, analysis, and data presentation.
  • There is a clear need for standardized guidelines to enhance the conduct and reporting of crossover trials.
  • Improved reporting standards are essential for the reliable interpretation and synthesis of evidence from crossover studies.