Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Contaminants and Errors

Contaminants and Errors

Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.

Random and Systematic Errors

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...

Random and Systematic Errors

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...

Uncertainty: Overview

Uncertainty: Overview

In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Statistical mistakes and how to avoid them - lessons learned from the reproducibility crisis.

Osteoarthritis and cartilage·2018

Same author

Non-inferiority and equivalence trials.

The British journal of surgery·2017

Same author

Statistical models and confounding adjustment.

The British journal of surgery·2017

Same author

Kaplan-Meier curve.

The British journal of surgery·2017

Same author

Spurious findings.

The British journal of surgery·2016

Same author

Overfitting.

The British journal of surgery·2016

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 23, 2026

An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion

An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion

Published on: March 31, 2022

Sampling uncertainty in medical research.

¹National Musculoskeletal Competence Centre, Department of Orthopaedics, Lund University Hospital, SE-22185 Lund, Sweden. jonas.ranstam@med.lu.se

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

|May 5, 2009

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Understanding statistical concepts like populations, samples, and sampling uncertainty is crucial for medical research. This review clarifies these fundamental principles for better scientific communication and interpretation.

More Related Videos

Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement

Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement

Published on: July 29, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 23, 2026

An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion

An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion

Published on: March 31, 2022

Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement

Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement

Published on: July 29, 2013

Area of Science:

Medical Research Methodology
Biostatistics
Scientific Communication

Background:

Statistical analysis is essential in medical research.
Misunderstanding fundamental statistical principles negatively impacts scientific publications.
Clear understanding is needed for both authors and readers.

Purpose of the Study:

To provide a methodological overview of key statistical concepts.
To enhance understanding of populations, samples, analysis units, and sampling uncertainty.
To improve the quality of statistical reporting in medical research.

Main Methods:

Methodological review of core statistical principles.
Focus on conceptual clarity of populations and samples.
Explanation of analysis units and sampling uncertainty.

Main Results:

Clarified definitions and relationships between populations, samples, and analysis units.
Detailed explanation of sampling uncertainty and its implications.
Provided a foundational understanding of essential statistical concepts.

Conclusions:

Improved understanding of statistical concepts is vital for medical research.
Accurate application of statistical principles enhances research integrity.
This overview serves as a guide for researchers and readers.