Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Methodological standards for assessing therapeutic equivalence.

B Kirshner1

  • 1Peel Health Department, Brampton, Ontario, Canada.

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
|January 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assessing symptom control in palliative home care.

Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien·2011
Same author

The evaluation of the effectiveness of routine restaurant inspections and education of food handlers: restaurant inspection survey.

Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique·1994
Same author

Routine restaurant inspections and education of food handlers: recommendations based on critical appraisal of the literature and survey of Canadian jurisdictions on restaurant inspections and education of food handlers.

Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique·1994
Same author

Measuring health status: what are the necessary measurement properties?

Journal of clinical epidemiology·1992
Same author

A methodologic framework for health status measures: clarity or oversimplification?

Journal of clinical epidemiology·1992
Same author

Comparison between the prevalence and treatment of wheezing and coughing in Brampton and Mississauga children.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·1990
Same journal

A comparison of five statistical methods used to analyse longitudinal EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life scores in randomised controlled trials: a simulation study.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Sample Size Determination for Decision-centered Pragmatic Trials.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Many multicenter randomized controlled trials do not account for center effect: a methodological review.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Patient Acceptability of the Modified Zelen Approach to Randomized Trials - A Survey of the CAPS THA Cohort.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to SPICE-GRADE: simultaneous processing of indirect causal evidence in complex pathways using GRADE - an exploratory case study. [Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 194C (2026) 112219].

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Small numbers of clusters in cluster randomised trials: a scoping review of problems and proposed solutions.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
See all related articles

This study proposes guidelines for evaluating clinical trials to confirm therapeutic equivalence between new and standard treatments. It addresses challenges in measuring outcomes to ensure reliable equivalence testing.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Pharmacoeconomics
  • Drug Development

Background:

  • Defining and demonstrating therapeutic equivalence is crucial for drug approval and market access.
  • Existing methods for assessing therapeutic equivalence face challenges in precision and validity.
  • Standardizing the evaluation of clinical trial data is essential for regulatory decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review critical issues in defining and demonstrating therapeutic equivalence.
  • To propose a set of guidelines for critically appraising clinical trials for therapeutic equivalence.
  • To provide criteria for assessing the impact of outcome measurement imprecision on equivalence testing.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of existing methodologies for therapeutic equivalence assessment.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Development of a structured framework for evaluating clinical trial data.
  • Formulation of specific criteria for assessing outcome measurement validity in equivalence studies.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified key challenges in establishing therapeutic equivalence, including statistical and clinical considerations.
    • Proposed a comprehensive set of guidelines for the critical review of clinical trials.
    • Outlined methods to evaluate the influence of measurement imprecision on the validity of equivalence conclusions.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed guidelines offer a robust approach to assessing therapeutic equivalence.
    • Rigorous evaluation of clinical trials, considering outcome measurement precision, is vital for accurate therapeutic equivalence determination.
    • Adoption of these guidelines can enhance the reliability of therapeutic equivalence conclusions in drug development and regulation.