Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...

Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions

Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions

Creating and executing a nursing diagnosis helps nurses plan care and guide patient, family, and community interventions. They are developed based on a patient's physical evaluation and support measuring the outcomes. It is not recommended to select random interventions throughout the planning process. Instead, consider the following six essential factors when choosing interventions:

Measures of Intelligence

Measures of Intelligence

Psychologists measure intelligence by using standardized tests that produce a score known as the intelligence quotient or IQ. To understand IQ tests, it's important to recognize the key principles behind their construction: validity, reliability, and standardization.
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this; it...

Odds Ratio

Odds Ratio

The odds ratio (OR) is a statistical measure used extensively in epidemiology and research to quantify the strength of association between exposure and outcome across different groups. Unlike relative risk, which compares the probabilities of an event occurring, the odds ratio compares the odds of an event occurring in the exposed group to the odds of it occurring in the unexposed group. The odds, in this context, are calculated as the probability of the event happening divided by the...

Self-Report Tests of Personality

Self-Report Tests of Personality

Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Mechanical testing methods for orthopaedic research : an introduction.

Bone & joint research·2026

Same author

The design process for orthopaedic implants : an introduction.

Bone & joint research·2026

Same author

Mechanical comparison of different plate-and-screw configurations for repairing forearm diaphysis fractures: a systematic review.

European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society·2026

Same author

Where are orthopedic surgery graduates practising? A critical look at the last 30 years in Ontario.

Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie·2026

Same author

Mechanical Performance of Monoaxial Versus Polyaxial Locked Plates for Bone Fracture Repair: A Review.

Clinics in orthopedic surgery·2026

Same author

Consensus Recommendations and Insights on Infection: Commentary on an article by the International Consensus Meeting Executive Committee: "International Consensus Meeting on Infection. Top 10 Evidence-Backed Recommendations and Insights".

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2025

Same journal

Intraoperative Surgical Smoke During Arthroplasty: Early Unhealthy-Level Exposure and Approach-Dependent Risk.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2026

Same journal

Osteochondral Autograft Transfer for Focal Osteochondral Defects of the Knee: Indications, Technique, Outcomes, and Future Directions.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2026

Same journal

Timing of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Inhibitor Reinitiation and Risk of Wound Complications in Spinal Metastasis Surgery.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2026

Same journal

Do Younger Patients Undergoing Transfibular Total Ankle Arthroplasty Achieve Outcomes Comparable with Those of Older Patients? Interpreting Nonsignificant Differences in Clinical Research: Commentary on an article by Kevin A. Schafer, MD, et al.: "Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes at a Mean of 7 Years Following Primary Transfibular Total Ankle Arthroplasty in Younger and Older Patients".

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2026

Same journal

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes at a Mean of 7 Years Following Primary Transfibular Total Ankle Arthroplasty in Younger and Older Patients.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2026

Same journal

Quantifying Protrusio Risk in the Metastatic Acetabulum: A Step Toward Precision: Commentary on an article by Will Jiang, BS, et al.: "Development of a Radiographic Scoring System to Estimate Acetabular Protrusion Risk in Patients with Osteolytic Periacetabular Metastases".

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

Published on: June 21, 2010

Outcome instruments: rationale for their use.

Rudolf W Poolman¹, Marc F Swiontkowski, Jeremy C T Fairbank

¹Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Postbus 95500, 1090 HM Amsterdam, The Netherlands. poolman@trauma.nl

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume

|May 5, 2009

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Selecting high-quality orthopaedic outcome instruments is crucial for reliable research. This guide helps researchers choose appropriate tools and standardize their use in observational studies.

More Related Videos

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

Published on: June 21, 2010

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Area of Science:

Orthopaedic research
Health outcomes measurement

Background:

The proliferation of outcome instruments in orthopaedic research necessitates careful selection.
Not all available instruments meet rigorous quality standards for health status assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

To discuss quality criteria for evaluating health status outcome instruments.
To provide a tool for selecting appropriate instruments for orthopaedic observational studies.
To review future steps for standardizing outcome instrument use in orthopaedics.

Main Methods:

Discussion of established criteria for assessing measurement properties and quality of health status instruments.
Presentation of a selection tool for researchers.
Review of steps for future implementation and standardization.

Main Results:

Identified a need for critical appraisal of outcome instruments due to varying development standards.
Provided guidance on selecting validated instruments for orthopaedic research.
Outlined a path towards standardization of outcome measure utilization.

Conclusions:

Adherence to strict quality criteria is essential when selecting orthopaedic outcome instruments.
Standardized use of validated instruments will enhance the reliability and comparability of orthopaedic research findings.
The proposed tool aids researchers in making informed decisions for study design.