Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A confidence...
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor 't,' or...
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation01:24

One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation

This lesson introduces two critical methods in pharmacokinetics, the Wagner-Nelson and Loo-Riegelman methods, used for estimating the absorption rate constant (ka) for drugs administered via non-intravenous routes. The Wagner-Nelson method relates ka to the plasma concentration derived from the slope of a semilog percent unabsorbed time plot. However, it is limited to drugs with one-compartment kinetics and can be impacted by factors like gastrointestinal motility or enzymatic degradation.
On...
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests01:19

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests

A goodness-of-fit test is conducted to determine whether the observed frequency values are statistically similar to the frequencies expected for the dataset. Suppose the expected frequencies for a dataset are equal such as when predicting the frequency of any number appearing when casting a die. In that case, the expected frequency is the ratio of the total number of observations (n) to the number of categories (k).

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Relation of Person-Centered Peer Behavior Profiles to Individual, Relationship, and Group Measures of Peer Social Competence.

The Journal of genetic psychology·2026
Same author

Accounting for extra-binomial variability with differentially expressed genetic pathway data: a collaborative bioinformatic study.

Stat (International Statistical Institute)·2023
Same author

The Utility of Assessing Alexithymia, in Addition to Coping, in the Context of Posttraumatic Stress.

The Journal of nervous and mental disease·2022
Same author

Adjusting statistical benchmark risk analysis to account for non-spatial autocorrelation, with application to natural hazard risk assessment.

Journal of applied statistics·2022
Same author

Benchmark dose risk analysis with mixed-factor quantal data in environmental risk assessment.

Environmetrics·2021
Same author

'Single-subject studies'-derived analyses unveil altered biomechanisms between very small cohorts: implications for rare diseases.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2021
Same journal

Symmetric Directional False Discovery Rate Control.

Statistical methodology·2017
Same journal

Latent Class Analysis of Incomplete Data via an Entropy-Based Criterion.

Statistical methodology·2016
Same journal

Incorporating auxiliary information for improved prediction using combination of kernel machines.

Statistical methodology·2014
Same journal

Efficient network meta-analysis: a confidence distribution approach.

Statistical methodology·2014
Same journal

A default prior distribution for contingency tables with dependent factor levels.

Statistical methodology·2014
Same journal

A note about the identifiability of causal effect estimates in randomized trials with non-compliance.

Statistical methodology·2014
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

Simultaneous Confidence Bands for Abbott-Adjusted Quantal Response Models.

Brooke E Buckley1, Walter W Piegorsch

  • 1Department of Mathematics, Northern Kentucky University, Highland Heights, KY 41099, USA.

Statistical Methodology
|May 5, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new method for estimating low-dose risk using simultaneous confidence bands. It helps determine benchmark dose (BMD) and associated risk levels for quantal response data.

More Related Videos

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator (TAPS)
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator (TAPS)

Published on: June 3, 2009

Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity
07:28

Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity

Published on: January 21, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator (TAPS)
19:44

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator (TAPS)

Published on: June 3, 2009

Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity
07:28

Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity

Published on: January 21, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Toxicology and Biostatistics
  • Quantitative Risk Assessment

Background:

  • Accurate low-dose risk estimation is crucial for regulatory science.
  • Quantal response data requires specialized statistical methods for risk assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To apply Scheffé-style simultaneous confidence bands for low-dose risk estimation.
  • To derive methods for estimating extra risk and benchmark dose (BMD) from quantal response data.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized Abbott-adjusted Weibull and log-logistic dose-response models.
  • Employed simultaneous confidence band construction for risk estimation.
  • Inverted upper risk bands to determine lower bounds for benchmark dose (BMD).

Main Results:

  • Developed methods for estimating upper confidence limits on predicted extra risk.
  • Established lower bounds for the benchmark dose (BMD) at specified benchmark risk levels.
  • Monte Carlo simulations evaluated the performance of the simultaneous limits.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed Scheffé-style simultaneous confidence bands provide a robust framework for low-dose risk assessment.
  • This approach enhances the estimation of benchmark dose (BMD) and associated risk.
  • Further Monte Carlo evaluations are necessary to fully understand the operating characteristics.