Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs01:09

Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs

The Wilcoxon signed-rank test for matched pairs evaluates the null hypothesis by combining the ranks of differences with their signs. It essentially tests whether the median of the differences in a population of matched pairs is zero. Since the test incorporates more information than the sign test, it generally yields more trustable conclusions. This test also does not require the data to follow a normal distribution, but two conditions must be met for it to be applicable: (1) the data must...
Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in value between...
Odds Ratio01:09

Odds Ratio

The odds ratio (OR) is a statistical measure used extensively in epidemiology and research to quantify the strength of association between exposure and outcome across different groups. Unlike relative risk, which compares the probabilities of an event occurring, the odds ratio compares the odds of an event occurring in the exposed group to the odds of it occurring in the unexposed group. The odds, in this context, are calculated as the probability of the event happening divided by the...
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Spearman's Rank Correlation Test01:20

Spearman's Rank Correlation Test

Spearman's rank correlation test, also known as Spearman's rho, is a nonparametric method for assessing the strength and direction of association between two variables. This test is particularly valuable when the data distribution is unknown or when the assumption of normality does not hold. Named after the English psychologist and statistician Dr. Charles Edward Spearman, it serves as the nonparametric counterpart to Pearson's correlation coefficient.
Spearman's test calculates correlation by...
Comparison Tests01:28

Comparison Tests

An infinite series composed of positive terms may either approach a finite value or increase without bound. Determining which outcome occurs is a central task in calculus, and comparison tests provide structured methods for making this determination. Rather than evaluating a series directly, these tests relate it to another series whose behavior is already known, allowing conclusions to be drawn through logical comparison.The direct comparison test applies to series with positive terms. If each...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for unprotected left main stenosis: 10-year final results from the randomised, open-label, non-inferiority NOBLE trial.

Lancet (London, England)·2026
Same author

Workflow-based Framework to Aid with High-Definition Intravascular Ultrasound-Optimised Coronary Stenting: Introducing IVUS 123 Essentials.

Interventional cardiology (London, England)·2026
Same author

An evaluation of ForenSeq DNA Signature Prep iiSNP mixture interpretation using a probabilistic genotyping method.

Forensic science international. Genetics·2026
Same author

Proximal Cap Ambiguity.

Interventional cardiology clinics·2025
Same author

PCI of Native Coronary Artery vs Saphenous Vein Graft After Prior Bypass Surgery: A Multicenter, Randomized Trial.

Journal of the American College of Cardiology·2025
Same author

Reporting the value of biological findings given activity level propositions: A discussion of published recommendations.

Journal of forensic sciences·2025

Related Experiment Videos

Database crime to crime match rate calculation.

John Buckleton1, Jo-Anne Bright, Simon J Walsh

  • 1ESR, Private Bag, 92021 Auckland, New Zealand. John.buckleton@esr.cri.nz

Forensic Science International. Genetics
|May 6, 2009
PubMed
Summary

Estimating crime sample match rates is challenging. This study proposes a novel logical method to determine match rates, addressing a gap in current forensic database guidance.

Area of Science:

  • Forensic science
  • Biometrics
  • Database management

Background:

  • Existing guidance focuses on counting matches in forensic databases.
  • A clear definition for estimating the overall match rate is currently lacking.
  • This absence hinders accurate assessment of database performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel method for estimating the match rate in crime sample databases.
  • To provide a logical framework for match rate estimation independent of match counting definitions.
  • To address the identified gap in forensic database analysis guidance.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a new logical framework for match rate estimation.
  • The method is derived from first principles rather than existing match counting protocols.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Focus on the underlying statistical and logical structure of database comparisons.

    • Main Results:

    • A robust and logically sound method for estimating crime sample match rates has been developed.
    • The proposed method offers a viable alternative to existing, albeit incomplete, guidance.
    • The approach provides a clear definition for match rate estimation.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed method successfully addresses the lack of a defined approach for estimating crime sample match rates.
    • This work provides essential guidance for forensic database analysis and performance evaluation.
    • The new method enhances the scientific rigor of forensic database utilization.