Is quantitative PCR for the pneumolysin (ply) gene useful for detection of pneumococcal lower respiratory tract

G Abdeldaim1, B Herrmann, J Korsgaard

  • 1Department of Clinical Microbiology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.

Insights

Quantitative PCR targeting the pneumolysin (ply) gene for Streptococcus pneumoniae detection in lower respiratory tract infections showed low clinical utility. High cut-offs improved specificity but reduced sensitivity, suggesting alternative gene targets are needed.

Area of Science:

  • Microbiology
  • Molecular Diagnostics
  • Infectious Diseases

Background:

  • The pneumolysin (ply) gene is a common target for detecting Streptococcus pneumoniae via PCR.
  • False-positive results have been reported with conventional ply-based PCR assays.
  • The clinical utility of quantitative ply-based PCR for diagnosing pneumococcal lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) requires further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the performance of a quantitative ply-based PCR assay for identifying pneumococcal LRTI.
  • To determine optimal cut-off values for quantitative ply-based PCR in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective study involving 156 hospitalized adult patients with LRTI and 31 controls.
  • Fibreoptic bronchoscopy was performed to collect BAL fluid.
  • Quantitative ply-based PCR was performed on BAL fluid, with results compared to BAL fluid culture, blood culture, and urinary antigen tests.

Main Results:

  • Quantitative ply-based PCR positivity varied significantly with different genome copy/mL cut-offs (>10^3, >10^5, >10^7).
  • Sensitivities ranged from 53% to 89%, while specificities ranged from 43% to 90% across different cut-offs.
  • A high cut-off (10^7 genome copies/mL) yielded high specificity (90%) but low sensitivity (53%).

Conclusions:

  • A high cut-off for quantitative ply-based PCR is necessary for acceptable specificity in diagnosing pneumococcal LRTI.
  • However, this high cut-off leads to low sensitivity, rendering the assay clinically questionable.
  • Further research into quantitative PCR methods targeting alternative genes for S. pneumoniae detection is recommended.