Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

A Familiarization Protocol Facilitates the Participation of Children with ASD in Electrophysiological Research
Published on: July 31, 2017
Respecting autonomy in young people
Insights
Pediatricians navigate complex ethical dilemmas when children refuse medical treatment, balancing the duty to protect life and health against respecting patient autonomy. This paper offers practical guidance for resolving these conflicts in clinical practice.
Area of Science:
- Medical Ethics
- Pediatric Healthcare
- Bioethics
Background:
- Paediatricians balance duties to protect child health and respect autonomy.
- Conflicts arise when children refuse or resist medical interventions.
- Disagreements can occur between children, parents, and healthcare providers regarding treatment decisions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the ethical and legal challenges in paediatric decision-making when patient autonomy conflicts with parental or physician duties.
- To analyze clinical cases involving refusal of treatment, withdrawal of life-sustaining care, and child protection.
- To provide practical advice for resolving ethical tensions in everyday paediatric clinical practice.
Main Methods:
- Case study analysis based on clinical experiences.
- Evaluation of ethical and legal principles in paediatric care.
- Exploration of conflicts between patient autonomy, parental rights, and physician obligations.
Main Results:
- Identifies scenarios where the duty to protect may override the duty to respect autonomy in paediatric care.
- Highlights the complexities of decision-making when children's wishes conflict with parental or medical recommendations.
- Presents a framework for navigating difficult ethical and legal issues, including "hard cases".
Conclusions:
- Resolving conflicts in paediatric decision-making requires careful consideration of the child's evolving autonomy and the specific clinical context.
- Practical strategies are needed to support paediatricians in ethically and legally sound decision-making.
- Addressing these challenges is crucial for upholding both patient well-being and ethical standards in paediatric medicine.
Abstract:
Paediatricians have a duty to protect the life and health of their patients and to respect their autonomy. Usually, there will be no conflict between these duties. Both children and parents want effective care and agree to the medical interventions that that are most likely to provide it. However, when children refuse or resist such interventions, it may be unclear when the duty to protect trumps the duty to respect. This is because children may have differing levels of autonomy, sometimes making them competent to make medical decisions for themselves and at other times not. Further, there may be conflict between the children and their parents in such circumstances. Children may refuse treatments that parents desire or vice versa. Sometimes paediatricians may agree with the child in the face of legal powers of parental guardianship. At other times they may agree with the parents, facing the prospect of forcing treatment on an unwilling child with potentially devastating psychological consequences. This paper will explore this potential ethical and legal minefield by evaluating some practical clinical cases based on the experiences of the primary author. It provides a range of examples of these different types of conflicts, including especially problematic "hard cases" that concern the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment and child protection. The goal of the article is not simply to morally and legally outline the boundaries of such tensions in paediatric care. It also provides concrete advice about how they should best be resolved in everyday clinical practice.
Related Concept Videos
Influence of Parents and Peers on Identity
Parental Influence on Identity Development
Parents serve as primary guides and managers in an adolescent's life, offering support instrumental in decision-making and personal growth. This guiding role...
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition
Erikson's Theory on Socioemotional Development during Adolescence
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other
Cognitive Development During Adolescence

