Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Suction curettage with a tissue trap compared with sharp curettage for tissue sampling.

R J Gimpelson1, J Hill

  • 1Chesterfield, Metropolitan Medical Center, St. Louis, Missouri.

The Journal of Reproductive Medicine
|July 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Search for proton decay via p-->e+pi0 and p-->micro+pi0 in a large water Cherenkov detector.

Physical review letters·2009
Same author

A predictive model for local recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer.

The British journal of surgery·2009
Same author

Cumulative lifetime incidence of extracolonic cancers in Lynch syndrome: a report of 121 families with proven mutations.

Clinical genetics·2009
Same author

Robotic laser tissue welding of sclera using chitosan films.

Lasers in surgery and medicine·2009
Same author

Stenting and colorectal cancer.

The British journal of surgery·2008
Same author

Reduced quality of bovine embryos cultured in media conditioned by exposure to an inflamed endometrium.

Australian veterinary journal·2008

Suction curettage using tissue traps provides more adequate endometrial tissue samples than sharp curettage. This improved thoroughness ensures better diagnostic accuracy in gynecological assessments.

Area of Science:

  • Gynecology
  • Surgical Pathology

Background:

  • Endometrial sampling is crucial for diagnosing gynecological conditions.
  • Previous studies suggested comparable efficacy among various endometrial sampling techniques.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the adequacy of endometrial tissue sampling between suction curettage with tissue traps and sharp curettage.
  • To evaluate the thoroughness of each technique, particularly when used as a secondary procedure.

Main Methods:

  • A study involving 114 cases of endometrial sampling.
  • Comparison of tissue adequacy when suction curettage or sharp curettage was performed first and second.
  • Assessment of sample adequacy based on the specific curettage method used.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Adequate tissue was obtained in all cases regardless of the initial procedure.
  • When used as a second procedure, suction curettage yielded adequate tissue in 56/57 cases, compared to 43/57 for sharp curettage.
  • Suction curettage utilizing tissue traps demonstrated superior thoroughness over sharp curettage.

Conclusions:

  • Suction curettage with tissue traps is a more effective method for obtaining adequate endometrial tissue samples.
  • The findings suggest that suction curettage offers improved diagnostic yield compared to sharp curettage, especially in repeat sampling scenarios.