Carbohydrate-aromatic pi interactions: a test of density functionals and the DFT-D method.
Rajesh K Raju1, Anitha Ramraj, Ian H Hillier
1School of Chemistry, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, M13 9PL, Manchester, UK.
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics : PCCP
|May 8, 2009
Summary
Density functional theory (DFT) methods accurately describe carbohydrate-pi interactions. The M06 functionals and DFT-D method show superior performance for these interactions, outperforming traditional functionals.
Area of Science:
- Computational Chemistry
- Quantum Chemistry
- Biomolecular Interactions
Background:
- Carbohydrate-pi interactions are crucial in biological systems.
- Accurate computational modeling of these interactions is essential for understanding molecular recognition.
- Density Functional Theory (DFT) is a widely used method for electronic structure calculations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the performance of various DFT functionals for describing carbohydrate-pi interactions.
- To identify the most accurate DFT methods for modeling these non-covalent interactions.
- To compare DFT results against high-level ab initio calculations.
Main Methods:
- A database of interaction energies for representative carbohydrate-pi complexes was compiled using high-level ab initio methods.
- Eighteen different DFT functionals, including M05 and M06 families, were tested.
- The DFT-D method, incorporating empirical dispersion corrections, was also evaluated.
Main Results:
- The DFT-D method and M06 class of functionals demonstrated excellent performance in describing carbohydrate-pi interactions.
- Traditional functionals, such as B3LYP, exhibited poor accuracy.
- Calculated interaction energies for 23 sugar-aromatic complexes using DFT-D were compared with results from 18 functionals, confirming the superiority of M06.
Conclusions:
- The M06 functionals and DFT-D method are highly recommended for accurate calculations of carbohydrate-pi interactions.
- Traditional DFT functionals are less suitable for this type of non-covalent interaction.
- This study provides valuable guidance for selecting appropriate computational methods in carbohydrate-pi interaction research.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Aromatic Hydrocarbon Anions: Structural Overview
Neutral hydrocarbons like cyclopentadiene with an odd number of carbon atoms and one intervening CH2 group in the ring are not aromatic. Cyclopentadiene with 4 π electrons does not satisfy the 4n + 2 π electron rule. Additionally, the intervening CH2 group is sp3 hybridized and lacks a vacant p orbital, thereby interrupting the overlap of p orbitals in a continuous manner and preventing the delocalization of π electrons throughout the ring.
Due to the absence of continuous overlap of p...
Due to the absence of continuous overlap of p...
π Electron Effects on Chemical Shift: Aromatic and Antiaromatic Compounds
In aromatic compounds, such as benzene, the circulation of (4n + 2) π-electrons sets up a diamagnetic or diatropic ring current around the perimeter of the molecule. This current induces a magnetic field that opposes the external field inside the ring and reinforces it on the outside. The protons in benzene are deshielded and exhibit high chemical shifts in the range 6.5–8.5 ppm. The shielding effect at the center of the ring is evident in complex aromatic molecules, such as annulenes. In...
Criteria for Aromaticity and the Hückel 4n + 2 Rule
Like benzene, cyclobutadiene and cyclooctatetraene are cyclic compounds with alternate single and double bonds. However, their chemical behavior differs from benzene, as they are unstable and not aromatic. So, what are the structural characteristics of unsaturated compounds categorized as aromatic?
For the first time, Eric Hückel, a German chemical physicist, derived a set of structural features for a compound to be classified as aromatic. This is now known as Hückel’s rule or the 4n + 2 rule.
For the first time, Eric Hückel, a German chemical physicist, derived a set of structural features for a compound to be classified as aromatic. This is now known as Hückel’s rule or the 4n + 2 rule.
Frost Circles for Different Conjugated Systems
The inscribed polygon method is consistent with Hückel’s 4n + 2 rule and helps to learn whether the given cyclic compound is aromatic or not. The compound is stable and aromatic if every bonding molecular orbital (MO) is completely filled with a pair of electrons. However, if the non-bonding or antibonding orbitals are filled with electrons, the compound is unstable and not aromatic. Consider the Frost circle diagrams for cycloalkenes containing 4 to 8 carbons.
NMR Spectroscopy of Aromatic Compounds
Aromatic compounds can be identified or analyzed using proton NMR and carbon‐13 NMR. Typically, aromatic hydrogens or hydrogens directly bonded to the aromatic rings are strongly deshielded by the aromatic ring current. Therefore, they absorb in the range of 6.5–8.0 ppm in proton NMR spectra. For instance, aromatic hydrogens directly bonded to the benzene ring absorb at 7.3 ppm. However, aromatic hydrogens of larger rings absorb farther upfield or downfield than the ideal range. Consider...
Aromatic Hydrocarbon Cations: Structural Overview
Cycloheptatriene is a neutral monocyclic unsaturated hydrocarbon that consists of an odd number of carbon atoms and an intervening sp3 carbon in the ring. The three double bonds in the ring correspond to 6 π electrons, which is a Huckel number, and therefore satisfies the criteria of 4n + 2 π electrons. However, the intervening sp3 carbon disrupts the continuous overlap of p orbitals. As a result, cycloheptatriene is not aromatic.
Removing one hydrogen from the intervening CH2 group with both...
Removing one hydrogen from the intervening CH2 group with both...


