Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Reports III: Telephone and Verbal Reports01:26

Types of Reports III: Telephone and Verbal Reports

Telephone and Verbal Reports in healthcare settings are two communication methods for conveying therapeutic instructions from healthcare providers to nurses or other healthcare staff.
Here's an overview of each type:
Telephone Orders
Types of Reports II: Incident or Occurrence Report01:21

Types of Reports II: Incident or Occurrence Report

An Incident or Occurrence Report in a healthcare setting is a crucial document used to record any unexpected occurrence that may or may not have affected a patient, employee, or visitor. Such reports are critical to improving patient safety and include all details leading up to and including the event.
Purposes:
In the healthcare industry, reports play a crucial role in documenting incidents within an agency. The primary objective of these reports is to ensure patient safety, uphold the...
Data Reporting and Recording01:24

Data Reporting and Recording

Reporting and recording are crucial in data documentation. The timely, thorough, and accurate documentation of facts is essential when recording patient data. Failure to record findings during an assessment or interpretation of a problem will result in loss of information and make the patient document unreliable. The reader is left with general impressions if the information is not specific. A recording is documenting data of the individual's health information in a traceable, secure, and...
Guidelines for Writing Outcome01:11

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...
SBAR I: Understanding the Concept01:29

SBAR I: Understanding the Concept

Effective communication among healthcare professionals during hand-off reporting is essential to delivering safe and continuous patient care. Common professional interactions include reports to healthcare team members, hand-off, and transfer reports. Nurses routinely report information to other healthcare team members and also urgently contact healthcare providers to report changes in patient status.
Standardized methods of communication have been developed to ensure that information is...
Types of Reports I: Hand-off Report01:25

Types of Reports I: Hand-off Report

A hand-off report, also known as a change-of-shift report, is a crucial nursing process that ensures the smooth transition of patient care responsibilities between nursing staff.
Following are the key components and categories of hand-off reports:
Purpose and Process:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

NCI Awardee Skills Development Consortium (NASDC): a Successful Novel Educational Effort to Maintain Early Academic Competitiveness: PART 1-Overview of the NASDC Coordinating Center.

Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education·2025
Same author

Ending one conversation, starting another.

The Journal of clinical investigation·2025
Same author

A conversation with Zhijian (James) Chen.

The Journal of clinical investigation·2025
Same author

A conversation with Stanley Prusiner.

The Journal of clinical investigation·2024
Same author

A conversation with Elias Zerhouni.

The Journal of clinical investigation·2024
Same author

A conversation with Olufunmilayo Olopade.

The Journal of clinical investigation·2024
Same journal

Extracellular matrix reprogramming by the YAP/TAZ- TGF-ß2 axis drives immune exclusion in cholangiocarcinoma models.

The Journal of clinical investigation·2026
Same journal

Tumor cell-derived extracellular vesicles foster the immunosuppressive landscape of pancreatic cancer.

The Journal of clinical investigation·2026
Same journal

Julie Zikherman receives the ASCI/Marian W. Ropes, MD, Award.

The Journal of clinical investigation·2026
Same journal

Targeted degradation of MDM2 overcomes feedback regulation of p53 signaling in Merkel cell carcinoma models.

The Journal of clinical investigation·2026
Same journal

SGLT2 inhibitors enhance ketogenesis by acting as allosteric activators of the mitochondrial enzyme HMGCS2.

The Journal of clinical investigation·2026
Same journal

MDM2 degraders for Merkel cell carcinoma: round peg in a round hole.

The Journal of clinical investigation·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Objectively Assessing Sports Concussion Utilizing Visual Evoked Potentials
12:11

Objectively Assessing Sports Concussion Utilizing Visual Evoked Potentials

Published on: April 27, 2021

How to write an effective referee report.

Ushma S Neill

    The Journal of Clinical Investigation
    |May 8, 2009
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This guide explains how to write effective peer reviews for scientific papers. It details essential components and the appropriate tone for constructive referee reports, improving the scientific publishing process.

    More Related Videos

    An Investigation of the Effects of Sports-related Concussion in Youth Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and the Head Impact Telemetry System
    07:02

    An Investigation of the Effects of Sports-related Concussion in Youth Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and the Head Impact Telemetry System

    Published on: January 12, 2011

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jun 23, 2026

    Objectively Assessing Sports Concussion Utilizing Visual Evoked Potentials
    12:11

    Objectively Assessing Sports Concussion Utilizing Visual Evoked Potentials

    Published on: April 27, 2021

    An Investigation of the Effects of Sports-related Concussion in Youth Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and the Head Impact Telemetry System
    07:02

    An Investigation of the Effects of Sports-related Concussion in Youth Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and the Head Impact Telemetry System

    Published on: January 12, 2011

    Area of Science:

    • Scientific publishing
    • Peer review process
    • Scholarly communication

    Background:

    • Traditional scientific peer review training is often informal.
    • This can lead to inconsistencies in the quality of referee reports.
    • A structured approach to peer review is needed.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To provide clear guidelines for writing effective peer reviews.
    • To outline the specific criteria used by the Journal of Clinical Investigation (JCI) for referee reports.
    • To improve the quality and consistency of peer review.

    Main Methods:

    • Defining the essential elements of a comprehensive referee report.
    • Establishing recommended tone and style for constructive criticism.
    • Providing examples of effective review practices.

    Main Results:

    • A structured framework for evaluating scientific manuscripts.
    • Clear expectations for the content and tone of peer reviews.
    • Enhanced clarity for authors and editors regarding review standards.

    Conclusions:

    • Implementing these guidelines can improve the peer review process.
    • Consistent, high-quality reviews benefit scientific discourse.
    • The JCI aims to foster a more effective and supportive peer review system.