Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Optimization of Transesophageal Atrial Pacing to Assess Atrial Fibrillation Susceptibility in Mice
Published on: June 29, 2022
Atrial electromechanical sequence and contraction synchrony during single- and multisite atrial pacing in patients
Alicja Dabrowska-Kugacka1, Ewa Lewicka-Nowak, Piotr Ruciński
1Department of Cardiology and Electrotherapy, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdánsk, Poland. adabrowska@amg.gda.pl
Objectives:
Investigation of which atrial pacing modality provides atrial synchrony and the most physiological atrial contraction pattern in patients with brady-tachycardia syndrome.
Methods:
Fifteen healthy subjects and 57 patients with sinus node dysfunction, atrial fibrillation recurrences, and prolonged P-wave on the electrocardiogram treated with multisite atrial (MSA) pacing were studied. One atrial lead was implanted in the coronary sinus (CS) ostium area, the other at the right atrial appendage (RAA): RAA+CS group (28 patients), or Bachmann's bundle (BB) region: BB+CS group (29). Sinus rhythm (SR) and CS, RAA, BB, RAA+CS, and BB+CS pacing modalities were evaluated. Electromechanical delay (EMD) in atrial walls was assessed by tissue Doppler echocardiography. Interatrial (DeltainterA), intra-right (DeltaRA), and intra-left (DeltaLA) atrial dyssynchrony were calculated.
Results:
During SR, in the study group versus controls, important DeltainterA: 55 +/- 23 versus 22 +/- 11 ms (P < 0.01) and DeltaLA: 47 +/- 21 versus 21 +/- 6 ms (P < 0.001) were present. Single-site BB and both MSA pacing modes restored DeltainterA and DeltaLA (DeltainterA: 24 +/- 16, 20 +/- 13 and 14 +/- 9 ms, DeltaLA: 28 +/- 18, 28 +/- 13 and 20 +/- 10 ms during BB, RAA+CS and BB+CS pacing, respectively). CS pacing prolonged lateral RA EMD, while RAA pacing LA walls EMD, which resulted in DeltainterA persistence. CS pacing induced DeltaRA (50 +/- 23 vs 16 +/- 8 ms, P < 0.0001 vs controls). Atrial contraction sequence during BB pacing resembled that observed in controls.
Conclusions:
(1) Single-site BB and both MSA pacing modes restored atrial synchrony. (2) Single-site RAA and CS ostium pacing retained interatrial dyssynchrony; moreover, CS pacing created RA dyssynchrony. (3) Single-site BB pacing provided physiological atrial contraction sequence.
Related Concept Videos
Dysrhythmias IV: Characteristics of Bradyarrhythmias
Dysrhythmias III: Characteristics of Dysrhythmias
Conduction System of the Heart
The pacemaker cells are located in two primary nodes: the sinoatrial (SA) node and the atrioventricular (AV) node. The SA node pacemaker cells can autonomously depolarize, triggering an action potential that leads to the...
Conduction System of the Heart
This system relies on the unique properties of nodal and Purkinje cells:...
Mechanism of Cardiac Arrhythmias
The Cardiac Cycle
The Process
Electrical signals—sent from the sinoatrial (SA) node in the right atrial wall to the atrioventricular (AV) node between the right atrium and right ventricle—cause both atria to simultaneously contract. When the signal reaches the AV node, it pauses for approximately a tenth of a second, allowing the atria to contract and empty blood into the...

