Knee resistance during passive stretch in patients with hypertonia

The aims of the study were to determine by a portable method (1) whether velocity-dependent changes in knee resistance in patients with spastic paresis differ from those in non-disabled subjects, and (2) whether biomechanical measures of resistance can differentiate between neural and other factors that contribute to hypertonia (increased resistance). Biomechanical (hand-hold dynamometer, electrogoniometer) and bioelectrical (EMG) measures of resistance were evaluated under static (slow stretch) and dynamic (fast stretch) conditions in twenty patients with hypertonia and 19 non-disabled subjects. Measures calculated for non-disabled subjects (control limbs) were compared to those calculated for patients (spastic limbs). Biomechanical measures of resistance did not differ strongly between groups of spastic and control limbs and between spastic limbs having different origins of knee hypertonia (neural vs. other), due to substantial variability. In contrary the static and dynamic bioelectrical measures of muscles activation were substantially larger in spastic limbs than in control limbs (p<0.05). The variability of biomechanical measures of resistance was due to varied patterns of muscle activation in response to stretch. We concluded that the biomechanical measures of hypertonia did not discriminate spastic patients from non-disabled subjects. To classify various types of knee hypertonia, the portable method should include not only analysis of biomechanical but also EMG characteristics of hypertonia. It is expected that the functional status of patients would be better predicted using clinical and quantitative measures of impairment if different classes of hypertonia (defined by different patterns of activation) were analyzed separately rather than analyzing the heterogeneous patient population as a whole.