Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Interference: Path Lengths01:10

Interference: Path Lengths

Consider two sources of sound, that may or may not be in phase, emitting waves at a single frequency, and consider the frequencies to be the same.
Two special sources may be considered when they are in phase. This can be easily achieved by feeding the two sources from the same source. An example would be synchronizing the two speakers by feeding them with the same source, such as the sound waves produced by a tuning fork. This setup ensures that the two sources have the same frequency and are...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prior exposure to speech rapidly modulates cortical processing of high-level linguistic structure.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2026
Same author

An electrophysiological investigation into 'Bagels': a song recorded to reduce subclinical anxiety in youth.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2025
Same author

Ten recommendations for reducing the carbon footprint of research computing in human neuroimaging.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025
Same author

Functional segregation of cortical hand and speech areas by frequency detuning of an intrinsic motor rhythm.

Journal of neurophysiology·2025
Same author

A Novel Candidate Neuromarker of Central Motor Dysfunction in Childhood Apraxia of Speech.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2025
Same author

New approaches to the single-interval adjustment matrix yes-no task.

Frontiers in psychology·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations
06:34

Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations

Published on: July 1, 2015

Event-related potentials for interaural time differences and spectral cues.

Michael J Hautus1, Blake W Johnson, Lincoln J Colling

  • 1Research Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. m.hautus@auckland.ac.nz

Neuroreport
|May 12, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Auditory perception relies on pitch cues. Event-related potentials show early negative and late positive components related to auditory segregation, especially when timing cues are present.

More Related Videos

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
09:52

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Published on: May 31, 2018

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations
06:34

Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations

Published on: July 1, 2015

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
09:52

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Published on: May 31, 2018

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Auditory Perception
  • Psychoacoustics

Background:

  • Auditory perception can segregate sound into distinct objects using various cues.
  • Dichotic pitches and mistuned harmonics demonstrate the brain's ability to differentiate auditory streams.
  • Event-related potentials (ERPs) offer insights into the neural processing of auditory information.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the neural correlates of auditory object formation using event-related potentials (ERPs).
  • To determine how different pitch cues (spectral vs. binaural timing) influence auditory segregation.
  • To examine the relationship between specific ERP components and the perception of one versus two auditory objects.

Main Methods:

  • Participants listened to auditory stimuli with monaural spectral pitch cues, binaural timing pitch cues, or a combination.
  • Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded and analyzed.
  • Stimuli were interleaved with control stimuli lacking pitch information.

Main Results:

  • Stimuli with binaural timing cues, or a combination of timing and spectral cues, reliably elicited an early negative and a late positive ERP component.
  • These components were larger in amplitude when both timing and spectral cues were present.
  • Stimuli with only spectral cues resulted in an attenuated early component and no detectable late component.

Conclusions:

  • Binaural timing cues are crucial for robust auditory segregation, as reflected by specific ERP components.
  • The combination of spectral and timing cues enhances the neural representation of auditory objects.
  • Spectral cues alone are less effective in driving the neural processes associated with auditory stream segregation.