Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy

Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy

Sigmoidoscopy and laparoscopy are distinct medical procedures that enable physicians to internally inspect different parts of the GI tract. Although they serve different purposes, each is essential for diagnosing and, in some cases, treating various medical conditions.
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...

Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

An Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is a diagnostic procedure in which an endoscopist uses a flexible, lighted endoscope to visualize the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract. The procedure includes visualizing the oropharynx, esophagus, stomach, and the first part of the small intestine, the duodenum.
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

OLGA and OLGIM Stages for Predicting Metachronous Gastric Neoplasm After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Patients With Early Gastric Cancer Without a Current <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> Infection Status.

Journal of gastric cancer·2026

Same author

Long-Term Effect of Helicobacter pylori Eradication on Gastric Atrophy and Intestinal Metaplasia After Endoscopic Resection of Gastric Neoplasm: A Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Helicobacter·2026

Same author

Endoscopic treatment of anastomotic leakage after upper gastrointestinal surgery: endoscopic self-expandable metallic stent or endoscopic vacuum therapy?

Clinical endoscopy·2026

Same author

K-LARS trial: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial evaluating a knowledge-enhanced digital intervention to prevent low anterior resection syndrome in Korea.

BMJ open·2025

Same author

Helicobacter pylori Infection and Metachronous Gastric Cancer in Elderly Patients With Gastric Cancer Aged ≥ 75 Years Who Underwent Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.

Helicobacter·2025

Same author

Clinicopathological Factors Affecting Stomach Preservation Following Laparoscopic Sentinel Node Navigation Surgery in Patients with Early Gastric Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of the Multicenter Randomized Phase III SENORITA Trial.

Annals of surgical oncology·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Single Incision Plus One Port Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy with Double Channel Anastomosis for Gastric Cancer Treatment

Single Incision Plus One Port Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy with Double Channel Anastomosis for Gastric Cancer Treatment

Published on: December 27, 2024

Developing an institutional protocol guideline for laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy.

Sang Eok Lee¹, Young-Woo Kim, Jun Ho Lee

¹Gastric Cancer Branch, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.

Annals of Surgical Oncology

|May 12, 2009

Summary

Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) is safe and effective for early gastric cancer, showing similar survival rates to open surgery. However, careful guidelines are needed before expanding its use.

More Related Videos

Laparoscopy-endoscopy Cooperative Surgery for the Treatment of Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Laparoscopy-endoscopy Cooperative Surgery for the Treatment of Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Published on: February 19, 2022

Laparoscopic Left Lateral Sectionectomy: Guided by the Ligamentum Teres Hepatis and the Umbilical Fissure Vein

Laparoscopic Left Lateral Sectionectomy: Guided by the Ligamentum Teres Hepatis and the Umbilical Fissure Vein

Published on: September 27, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Single Incision Plus One Port Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy with Double Channel Anastomosis for Gastric Cancer Treatment

Single Incision Plus One Port Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy with Double Channel Anastomosis for Gastric Cancer Treatment

Published on: December 27, 2024

Laparoscopy-endoscopy Cooperative Surgery for the Treatment of Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Laparoscopy-endoscopy Cooperative Surgery for the Treatment of Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Published on: February 19, 2022

Laparoscopic Left Lateral Sectionectomy: Guided by the Ligamentum Teres Hepatis and the Umbilical Fissure Vein

Laparoscopic Left Lateral Sectionectomy: Guided by the Ligamentum Teres Hepatis and the Umbilical Fissure Vein

Published on: September 27, 2024

Area of Science:

Surgical Oncology
Minimally Invasive Surgery
Gastrointestinal Surgery

Background:

Technical challenges in lymph node dissection limit laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) adoption.
Current institutional guidelines restrict LADG to clinical stage T1N0 or T1N1 gastric cancer.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of LADG based on institutional guidelines for early-stage gastric cancer.
To compare LADG with open distal gastrectomy (ODG) in terms of surgical outcomes, complications, and survival.

Main Methods:

A retrospective comparison of 294 LADG cases and 664 ODG cases for clinical T1N0/T1N1 gastric cancer.
Data collected included clinicopathologic characteristics, operative time, lymph node retrieval, postoperative stay, morbidity, and survival rates.

Main Results:

LADG had a longer operating time but retrieved more lymph nodes than ODG.
LADG resulted in a shorter hospital stay and lower complication rates.
No significant difference in overall survival rates was observed between LADG and ODG groups.

Conclusions:

LADG is a viable option for early gastric cancer (T1N0/T1N1) with comparable survival to ODG.
Developing clear guidelines and conducting audits are crucial before expanding LADG indications.
LADG demonstrates potential benefits in reduced morbidity and shorter hospital stays.