Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Transforaminal Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Foraminotomy Under Local Anesthesia for L5/S1 Adjacent Segment Foraminal Stenosis
Published on: October 17, 2025
[New surgical approach for presacral lesion by double door via S(3-5)]
Kangren Li1, Hui Qin, Siwei Lu
1Department of Orthopaedics, Chengdu Third People's Hospital, Chengdu Sichuan, PR China. kkweiqi@163.com
Objective:
To investigate a new surgical approach for presacral lesion by double door via S(3-5).
Methods:
From June 2007 to January 2008, 5 female patients (56-84 years old) with presacral lesion were treated. One patient had straining feeling in anus, 2 patients had difficult defecation and bloody stool and 2 patients had no symptoms. Digital rectal examination revealed rectal tumor in 2 cases and anus examination of presacral tumor showed no abnormality in 3 cases. B-ultrasound, CT and MRI examination displayed presacral tumor in 3 cases and rectumal tumor in 2 cases. The size of the lesions was 4 cm x 3 cm x 3 cm - 20 cm x 15 cm x 13 cm. The disease course was 12-50 days (average 18 days). All 5 patients received total resection of tumor through the surgical approach featured by double door via S(3-5).
Results:
The operations were successful in all the 5 patients, and no severe presacral venous hemorrhage, rectal injury, direct injury of pelvic nerve and structure damage of pelvic bottom occurred during operation. The approach exposure time was 12-28 minutes (average 20 minutes) and the blood loss for approach was 30-130 mL (average 80 mL); and the operation time was 80-120 minutes (average 105 minutes) and the blood loss during operation was 100-350 mL (average 280 mL). All incision healed by first intention. Pathological examination of resected tissue after operation revealed presacral teratoma in 1 case, dermoid cyst in 1 case, spindle cell tumor in 1 case and rectal tubiform villus adenoma in 2 cases. All the patients suffered from perineal hypoesthesia to various degrees after operation, which were recovered to the normal 6 months later, and X-ray films showed bone union occurred in all the cases. No gatism occurred. During the followed-up period of 6-13 months, no sacrum defect, pelvic instability and sacroiliitis was observed in the 5 cases. B-ultrasound, CT and MRI examination showed no recurrence of tumor.
Conclusion:
The approach of double door via S(3-5) is a simple and safe surgical procedure featured by a good surgical exposure with less bleeding, short operative time, no sacrum defect, no severe sacral nerve damage, and early postoperative convalescence.
