Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least squares (OLS)...
Survival Tree01:19

Survival Tree

Survival trees are a non-parametric method used in survival analysis to model the relationship between a set of covariates and the time until an event of interest occurs, often referred to as the "time-to-event" or "survival time." This method is particularly useful when dealing with censored data, where the event has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period, or when the exact time of the event is unknown.
 Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a survival tree begins...
Censoring Survival Data01:09

Censoring Survival Data

Survival analysis is a statistical method used to analyze time-to-event data, often employed in fields such as medicine, engineering, and social sciences. One of the key challenges in survival analysis is dealing with incomplete data, a phenomenon known as "censoring." Censoring occurs when the event of interest (such as death, relapse, or system failure) has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period or is otherwise unobservable, and it might have many different reasons...
Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
Determination of Expected Frequency01:08

Determination of Expected Frequency

Suppose one wants to test independence between the two variables of a contingency table. The values in the table constitute the observed frequencies of the dataset. But how does one determine the expected frequency of the dataset? One of the important assumptions is that the two variables are independent, which means the variables do not influence each other. For independent variables, the statistical probability of any event involving both variables is calculated by multiplying the individual...
Prediction Intervals01:03

Prediction Intervals

The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y. 
The...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Introducing the need for a consensus-based framework for protocol modifications to improve trial trustworthiness.

BMC medicine·2026
Same author

Supporting reanalysis and reuse of clinical trial data: a case study.

Trials·2026
Same author

A comparison of combined <i>p</i>-value functions for meta-analysis.

Research synthesis methods·2026
Same author

Addressing Outcome Reporting Bias in Meta-Analysis: A Selection Model Perspective.

Statistics in medicine·2025
Same author

Combined P-Value Functions for Compatible Effect Estimation and Hypothesis Testing in Drug Regulation.

Statistics in medicine·2025
Same author

A scoping review on metrics to quantify reproducibility: a multitude of questions leads to a multitude of metrics.

Royal Society open science·2025
Same journal

Fast penalized generalized estimating equations for large longitudinal functional datasets.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Causally-interpretable random-effects meta-analysis.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Statistical inference for mean function of partially observed functional time series.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Subgroup identification via Interaction Tree and Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with application to Alzheimer's disease.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Finite mixtures of linear quantile regressions with concomitant variables: a solution to endogeneity in longitudinal data modeling.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Discussion on "INTACT: a method for integration of longitudinal physical activity data from multiple sources" by Jingru Zhang, Erjia Cui, Hongzhe Li, and Haochang Shou.

Biometrics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 23, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Predictive model assessment for count data.

Claudia Czado1, Tilmann Gneiting, Leonhard Held

  • 1Zentrum Mathematik, Technische Universität München, Boltzmannstr. 3, D-85748 Garching, Germany.

Biometrics
|May 13, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces new tools for evaluating probabilistic forecasts and statistical models for count data. These methods, including calibration diagrams and scoring rules, improve the assessment of predictive performance for various models and data types.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 23, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Evaluating probabilistic forecasts and statistical models for count data is crucial for reliable predictions.
  • Existing methods may have limitations in assessing model performance and calibration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a comprehensive toolbox for the evaluation of probabilistic forecasts.
  • To critique statistical models specifically designed for count data.
  • To introduce novel methods for assessing predictive performance.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a nonrandomized probability integral transform.
  • Introduction of marginal calibration diagrams.
  • Application of proper scoring rules, including predictive deviance.
  • Case studies involving patent data and larynx cancer counts.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated utility of the proposed tools in critiquing count regression models.
  • Assessed the predictive performance of Bayesian age-period-cohort models.
  • Validated the applicability of the toolbox across diverse statistical settings.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed toolbox offers robust methods for evaluating probabilistic forecasts and statistical models for count data.
  • The tools are versatile, applicable in Bayesian or classical, parametric or nonparametric settings.
  • The methods are suitable for any ordered discrete outcome, enhancing statistical analysis reliability.