Perception and use of minimal access surgery simulators in pediatric surgery training programs
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026
Utilizing a 3D Printed Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication Model to Shorten a Resident's Learning Curve
Published on: August 15, 2025
David Lasko1, Mohammed Zamakhshary, J Ted Gerstle
1Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. dlasko@med.miami.edu
Background/Purpose:
In the current time-restricted training environment, simulator use in surgical teaching is receiving increasing attention. A large body of literature addresses simulators' effectiveness in surgical education. No prior studies assess how widely simulators are actually being used or attitudes about their effectiveness of those involved in training.
Methods:
Surveys were e-mailed to all current pediatric surgery trainees and training directors. Queries examined respondents' perceptions about surgical simulators' usefulness and to what extent they are used in their programs. Other questions assessed obstacles to simulator use.
Results:
Response rates were high (47% of program directors and 67% of current fellows). Nearly all respondents felt laparoscopic simulators improve training efficiency (88%). About half (55%) report regular simulator availability to trainees. Only 21% of programs have current or planned simulation curricula. Less than half of the training directors (32%) and about half of the fellows (55%) felt they have actually significantly improved trainees' skills.
Conclusions:
Trainees and training directors placed significant importance on simulator use in pediatric surgery training. However, most did not feel that simulators had actually improved the trainees' laparoscopic skills. Wider availability of simulation laboratories and protected time for using them would enhance the impact of simulators on pediatric surgery training.
