Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Assessing the Coherence of Parents' Short Narratives Regarding their Child Using the Five-Minute Speech Sample Procedure
Published on: September 19, 2019
Assessing children's exposure to intimate partner violence
John F Knutson1, Erika Lawrence, Sarah M Taber
1University of Iowa, E11 Seashore Hall, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA. john-knutson@uiowa.edu
Insights
Childhood exposure to intimate partner violence (IPV) impacts well-being, but definitions vary. This study highlights inconsistencies in measuring IPV exposure, affecting research on child outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Child Psychology
- Sociology
- Public Health
Background:
- Child exposure to intimate partner violence (IPV) is a known risk factor for adverse psycho-social and academic outcomes.
- Existing research often presents ambiguous links between IPV exposure and specific childhood consequences.
- This ambiguity may stem from inconsistent operational definitions of IPV exposure in studies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review current methods for defining child exposure to intimate partner violence (IPV).
- To identify problems associated with dominant operational definitions of IPV exposure.
- To present original data on the concordance of various IPV exposure measures and discuss implications for research and clinical practice.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of strategies for operationally defining child exposure to intimate partner violence (IPV).
- Analysis of original data comparing three maternal report measures and three child report measures of IPV exposure.
- Assessment of the concordance between different indices of IPV exposure.
Main Results:
- Significant discrepancies exist between maternal and child reports of intimate partner violence (IPV) exposure.
- Multiple measures derived from maternal reports show limited concordance.
- Multiple measures derived from child reports also show limited concordance.
- The concordance among all tested indices of IPV exposure was limited, indicating measurement challenges.
Conclusions:
- Inconsistent operational definitions of intimate partner violence (IPV) exposure contribute to ambiguous findings in child outcome research.
- The limited concordance among different IPV exposure measures necessitates careful consideration in research design and clinical assessments.
- Future research should focus on refining IPV exposure measures to improve understanding of its impact on child well-being.
Abstract:
Child exposure to intimate partner violence (IPV) is widely acknowledged as a threat to the psycho-social and academic well-being of children. Unfortunately, as reflected in the literature, the specific link between such exposure and childhood outcomes is ambiguous. Based on a review of the literature, this article suggests that this state of affairs is due, in part, to the manner with which exposure to IPV is operationally defined. After reviewing the dominant strategies for operationally defining exposure to IPV and the problems associated with those strategies, this article reports original data contrasting three measures derived from maternal reports, three measures derived from child reports, and the limited concordance among those different indices of exposure to IPV. The implications of these findings for research on child outcomes and the clinical assessment of children who might have been exposed to IPV are discussed.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Socioemotional Experience and Gender Development
Bullying
Conduct Disorder
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Group Design

