Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethics and Bioethics01:22

Ethics and Bioethics

Ethics is a philosophical study of moral actions. Ethics attempts to determine what is valuable for individuals and society. It examines the rational justification of moral judgments and analyzes what is morally just, fair, and right. Bioethics is a sub-discipline of applied ethics that analyzes the philosophical, social, and legal issues in life sciences and medicine. Ethical theories serve as a foundation for decision-making and represent the viewpoints from which people seek direction. They...
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
Ethical Dilemmas I01:17

Ethical Dilemmas I

Ethical dilemmas in nursing are of utmost importance, as they often arise from the tension between adhering to core ethical principles and the practical realities of healthcare delivery. These dilemmas require nurses to navigate complex situations where competing ethical considerations pull them in different directions.
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective01:23

Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective

In a study where individuals posing as strangers offered compliments and proposed casual sex to students, the responses differed significantly based on gender. Not a single woman accepted the proposal, while 70% of the men agreed. This outcome provides a useful scenario to explore through the lens of evolutionary psychology and social learning theory, highlighting the diverse perspectives on human sexual behaviors.
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
Empathy02:34

Empathy

Some researchers suggest that altruism operates on empathy. Empathy is the capacity to understand another person’s perspective, to feel what he or she feels. An empathetic person makes an emotional connection with others and feels compelled to help (Batson, 1991). Empathy can be expressed in several ways, including cognitive, affective, and motor.
Nursing Ethical Principles II01:27

Nursing Ethical Principles II

Ethical principles are essential in guiding nurses to fulfill their responsibilities, focusing on the quality of nursing care and decision-making. These principles, including autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, and fidelity, shape the ethical framework within healthcare settings.
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's cancer...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prognosis Prediction and Shared Decision Making for Personalised Anticoagulant Therapy after Unprovoked Venous Thromboembolism: The MORPHEUS project.

Thrombosis and haemostasis·2026
Same author

Long-term use of tDCS-clinical and ethical considerations.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2026
Same author

Challenges and Opportunities of the Human-Centered Design Approach: Case Study Development of an Assistive Device for the Navigation of Persons With Visual Impairment.

JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies·2025
Same author

Key components in the professional ethics of sign language interpreters in healthcare contexts: a qualitative study in Colombia.

BMJ open·2025
Same author

Consent as a compositional act - a framework that provides clarity for the retention and use of data.

Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM·2024
Same author

Assessing the implementation of user-centred design standards on assistive technology for persons with visual impairments: a systematic review.

Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

What 'empirical turn in bioethics'?

Samia Hurst1

  • 1Institute for Biomedical Ethics, CMU/1 rue Michel Servet, 1211 Geneva. samia.hurst@ unige.ch

Bioethics
|May 15, 2009
PubMed
Summary

The empirical turn in bioethics requires integrating empirical research with normative reasoning. Achieving true rigor involves adopting rigorous standards from empirical disciplines to enhance interdisciplinary research quality.

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Philosophy of Science

Background:

  • The 'empirical turn' in bioethics presents challenges in articulating empirical data with normative reasoning.
  • Existing approaches often fall short of fully integrating empirical methods and normative theory.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine different interpretations of the 'empirical turn' in bioethics.
  • To identify methodological shortcomings in the current integration of empirical research and normative reasoning.
  • To propose standards for improving the quality and rigor of empirical bioethics.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of the 'empirical turn' in bioethics.
  • Examination of the integration of empirical data and normative reasoning.
  • Discussion of methodological standards in interdisciplinary research.

More Related Videos

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
07:48

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research

Published on: November 26, 2015

Efficient Sampling of Genetically Encoded Biosensor Design Space Enabled with a Design of Experiments and Automation Workflow
08:58

Efficient Sampling of Genetically Encoded Biosensor Design Space Enabled with a Design of Experiments and Automation Workflow

Published on: October 17, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
07:48

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research

Published on: November 26, 2015

Efficient Sampling of Genetically Encoded Biosensor Design Space Enabled with a Design of Experiments and Automation Workflow
08:58

Efficient Sampling of Genetically Encoded Biosensor Design Space Enabled with a Design of Experiments and Automation Workflow

Published on: October 17, 2025

Main Results:

  • The 'empirical turn' is often narrowly interpreted as using empirical data to inform, rather than fully integrate with, normative reasoning.
  • Bioethics has adopted empirical tools but often lacks the rigorous standards of empirical disciplines.
  • Integrating empirical and normative approaches presents significant methodological challenges.

Conclusions:

  • A more complete 'empirical turn' requires adopting rigorous standards from empirical disciplines for validity and clarity.
  • Improving empirical bioethics necessitates clear articulation of empirical and normative aspects, meeting interdisciplinary rigor.
  • Addressing methodological concerns, rather than abstract debates, is key to advancing empirical bioethics research.