Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Multidisciplinary Approach to Obesity Management: A Case Report
Published on: May 30, 2025
Cost-effectiveness of routine and group programs for treatment of obese children
Marja Kalavainen1, Senja Karjalainen, Janne Martikainen
1Department of Pediatrics, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland. marja.kalavainen@kuh.fi
Insights
Family-based group treatment for childhood obesity is more expensive than routine counseling. While more effective, the higher costs, primarily from salaries, need consideration for resource allocation.
Area of Science:
- Health Economics
- Pediatric Obesity Treatment
- Intervention Studies
Background:
- Cost-effectiveness analysis is crucial for optimizing healthcare resource allocation.
- Obese children require effective interventions, with group treatment previously showing higher efficacy.
- This study compares the cost-effectiveness of group versus routine counseling for pediatric obesity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the cost-effectiveness of family-based group treatment versus routine counseling for obese children.
- To determine the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for both interventions.
Main Methods:
- A prospective 6-month intervention study comparing family-based group treatment with routine counseling.
- Outcome measures included changes in weight for height and body mass index standard deviation scores (BMI-SDS).
- Cost-effectiveness was analyzed from the service provider's perspective, calculating ICERs.
Main Results:
- Group treatment incurred higher costs per unit of weight-for-height decrease and BMI-SDS decrease compared to routine counseling.
- Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were €53 per 1% weight-for-height decrease and €266-€275 per 0.1 BMI-SDS decrease.
- Higher costs for group treatment were observed both at the end of the intervention and at 6-month follow-up.
Conclusions:
- Family-based group treatment for childhood obesity is more costly than individual routine counseling.
- Salaries constitute the majority of the total costs associated with the group treatment program.
- The findings highlight the trade-off between effectiveness and cost in pediatric obesity interventions.
Background:
Cost-effectiveness analyses facilitate the allocation of health care resources. The aim of the study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of group treatment, already known to be more effective, with routine counseling in obese children.
Method:
A prospective 6-month intervention assessed family-based group treatment (15 separate sessions for parents and children) and routine counseling (two appointments for children). Children's weights and heights were measured at baseline, at the end of the intervention and at follow up 6 months later, and the changes in weight for height and body mass index standard deviations scores (BMI-SDS) were calculated and used as main outcome measures. The mean costs and effects of the programs were analyzed to produce the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, which is an estimate of the additional costs per 1% decrease in weight for height or 0.1 decrease in BMI-SDS. Cost-effectiveness analysis was performed from the perspective of the service provider.
Results:
At the end of the intervention, group treatment costs were 1.4-fold (non-calculable 6 months later) when counted per 1% weight for height decrease, and 3.5-fold (2.8-fold 6 months later) when counted per 0.1 BMI-SDS decrease. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio estimates were euro 53 when calculated for 1% weight for height decrease, and euro 266 (euro 275 6 months later) when calculated for 0.1 BMI-SDS decrease.
Conclusions:
Family-based group treatment is more costly compared with individual routine counseling. Salaries form most of the total costs.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Dosing: Obese Patients
Obesity
Pharmacokinetics in Obese Patients: Drug Absorption and Distribution
Pharmacokinetics in Obese Patients: Drug Metabolism and Excretion
Operant Conditioning Intervention
In operant conditioning, behaviors that are...

