Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Gain01:15

Gain

Gain and phase shift are properties of linear circuits that describe the effect a circuit has on a sinusoidal input voltage or current. The circuit's behavior that contains reactive elements will depend on the frequency of the input sinusoid. As a result, it is observed that the gain and phase shift will all be frequency functions.
Gain:
Suppose Vin is the input and Vout is the output signal to a circuit.
Scaling01:26

Scaling

In designing and analyzing filters, resonant circuits, or circuit analysis at large, working with standard element values like 1 ohm, 1 henry, or 1 farad can be convenient before scaling these values to more realistic figures. This approach is widely utilized by not employing realistic element values in numerous examples and problems; it simplifies mastering circuit analysis through convenient component values. The complexity of calculations is thereby reduced, with the understanding that...
Basic Operations on Signals01:22

Basic Operations on Signals

Basic signal operations include time reversal, time scaling, time shifting, and amplitude transformations. These operations are fundamental in signal processing and analysis.
Time Reversal mirrors a continuous-time signal about the vertical axis at t=0. This is achieved by substituting t with −t. For example, if a signal x(t) is considered, the time-reversed signal is x(−t). This operation can be graphically represented, showing the mirrored signal.
Cascaded Op Amps01:16

Cascaded Op Amps

Operational amplifiers (op-amps) are versatile electronic components that can be interconnected in a cascade - one after another in a linear sequence. This cascading is possible due to their infinite input resistance and zero output resistance, allowing them to maintain their input-output relationships even when connected in series.
In a cascaded system, each op-amp is referred to as a stage. The output of one stage drives the input of the subsequent stage. As the input signal passes through...
Introduction to Scalers01:21

Introduction to Scalers

Many familiar physical quantities can be specified completely by giving a single number and the appropriate unit. For example, "a class period lasts 50 min," or "the gas tank in my car holds 65 L," or "the distance between the two posts is 100 m." A physical quantity that can be specified completely in this manner is called a scalar quantity. The word "scalar" is a synonym for "number." Time, mass, distance, length, volume, temperature, and energy are some examples of scalar quantities.
Scalar...
Small-Signal Analysis of MOSFET Amplifiers01:23

Small-Signal Analysis of MOSFET Amplifiers

In small-signal analysis, a MOSFET transistor amplifier acts as a linear amplifier when operating in its saturation region. The gate-to-source voltage (VGS) of the MOSFET is the sum of the DC biasing voltage and the small time-varying input signal. This combination sets up the operating point and modulates the drain current (ID) that flows from the drain to the source. When a small AC signal is superimposed on the DC bias voltage at the gate, the instantaneous drain current comprises three...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Online planning of sequential actions.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same author

Evaluating the concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of markerless motion capture for static postural control assessment.

Journal of biomechanics·2026
Same author

Reducing robotic upper-limb assessment time while maintaining precision: a time series foundation model approach.

Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation·2026
Same author

Sequence preparation is not always associated with a reaction time cost.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same author

Brain connectivity signatures of cognitive impairment in temporal lobe epilepsy identified by robotic assessment.

Neuroimage. Reports·2026
Same author

Infinite Horizon Control With Nonlinear Dynamics Models Reproduces Temporal Modulation of Reaching Movements.

Neural computation·2026
Same journal

Targeting intracranial electrical stimulation to network regions defined within individuals causes network-level effects.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same journal

When "Noise" Isn't Simply Noise: Deterministic Postural Drive During Noisy Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation (nGVS).

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same journal

Abrupt Scene Onsets and Gradually Emerging Scene Information Produce Distinct EEG Decoding Dynamics.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same journal

From discovery to translation: charting a course for the <i>Journal of Neurophysiology</i>.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same journal

Neuromodulatory Strategies Overcome Multiple Inevitable Impairments of Cerebral Palsy.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same journal

Acute Fentanyl Toxicity:From Opioid-Induced to Hypoxia-Mediated Pathophysiology.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 23, 2026

An Experimental Platform to Study the Closed-loop Performance of Brain-machine Interfaces
10:51

An Experimental Platform to Study the Closed-loop Performance of Brain-machine Interfaces

Published on: March 10, 2011

Temporal evolution of "automatic gain-scaling".

J Andrew Pruszynski1, Isaac Kurtzer, Timothy P Lillicrap

  • 1Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada.

Journal of Neurophysiology
|May 15, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The nervous system overcomes automatic gain-scaling in muscle responses by adjusting motor control over time. This adjustment ensures consistent limb stabilization despite varying initial muscle activity and external loads.

More Related Videos

A Method for Tracking the Time Evolution of Steady-State Evoked Potentials
12:03

A Method for Tracking the Time Evolution of Steady-State Evoked Potentials

Published on: May 25, 2019

Gain-compensation Methodology for a Sinusoidal Scan of a Galvanometer Mirror in Proportional-Integral-Differential Control Using Pre-emphasis Techniques
09:01

Gain-compensation Methodology for a Sinusoidal Scan of a Galvanometer Mirror in Proportional-Integral-Differential Control Using Pre-emphasis Techniques

Published on: April 4, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 23, 2026

An Experimental Platform to Study the Closed-loop Performance of Brain-machine Interfaces
10:51

An Experimental Platform to Study the Closed-loop Performance of Brain-machine Interfaces

Published on: March 10, 2011

A Method for Tracking the Time Evolution of Steady-State Evoked Potentials
12:03

A Method for Tracking the Time Evolution of Steady-State Evoked Potentials

Published on: May 25, 2019

Gain-compensation Methodology for a Sinusoidal Scan of a Galvanometer Mirror in Proportional-Integral-Differential Control Using Pre-emphasis Techniques
09:01

Gain-compensation Methodology for a Sinusoidal Scan of a Galvanometer Mirror in Proportional-Integral-Differential Control Using Pre-emphasis Techniques

Published on: April 4, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Motor Control
  • Human Physiology

Background:

  • The short-latency stretch response (R1) exhibits automatic gain-scaling, where response magnitude increases with pre-perturbation muscle activity.
  • Gain-scaling is thought to be an intrinsic property of the motoneuron pool, posing a challenge for the nervous system to maintain consistent load compensation.
  • The nervous system must counteract absolute load changes irrespective of initial muscle activity, a feat that appears to contradict intrinsic gain-scaling.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the temporal dynamics of gain-scaling across different phases of muscle activity following mechanical perturbation.
  • To determine how the nervous system modifies gain-scaling from early reflex responses to later voluntary corrections.
  • To explore the relationship between long-latency responses, voluntary control, and the reduction of gain-scaling.

Main Methods:

  • Subjects performed a behavioral task involving stabilizing their arm against varying background loads and random torque perturbations.
  • Gain-scaling was quantified in four elbow muscles (brachioradialis, biceps long, triceps lateral, triceps long) across distinct time windows post-perturbation.
  • Analysis covered the short-latency response (R1), long-latency responses (R2, R3), early voluntary corrections, and steady-state activity.

Main Results:

  • The short-latency response (R1) demonstrated significant gain-scaling, with increased background load leading to a proportional increase in muscle activity.
  • A rapid decrease in gain-scaling was observed starting in the long-latency epoch (around 75 ms post-perturbation).
  • No significant gain-scaling was detected during early voluntary corrections (120–180 ms) or steady-state activity (750–1250 ms).

Conclusions:

  • The nervous system effectively reduces or eliminates gain-scaling beyond the initial short-latency reflex.
  • Long-latency responses and voluntary motor control appear to be integrated processes that mitigate intrinsic gain-scaling.
  • This suggests a continuous sensorimotor control process utilizing shared neural circuitry for adaptive limb stabilization.