Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks
Published on: September 5, 2019
The interplay between prosody and syntax in sentence processing: the case of subject- and object-control verbs
Sara Bögels1, Herbert Schriefers, Wietske Vonk
1Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Centre for Cognition, Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands. S.Bogels@donders.ru.nl
Prosodic breaks (PB) influence syntactic analysis in auditory sentence processing. A prosodic break aids listeners in parsing object-control sentences, but not subject-control sentences, aligning with default preferences.
Area of Science:
- Psycholinguistics
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Computational Linguistics
Background:
- Auditory sentence processing involves determining syntactic structure.
- Prosodic information, such as prosodic breaks (PB), may guide syntactic analysis.
- The role of prosody in resolving syntactic ambiguity in Dutch is not fully understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether prosodic information affects syntactic analysis choice in auditory sentence processing.
- To examine the interaction between prosodic breaks and verb control type (subject vs. object) in syntactic ambiguity resolution.
- To determine if prosodic breaks influence syntactic processing differently for subject- and object-control verbs.
Main Methods:
- Experiment 1: Off-line fragment completion tests (visual and auditory) to establish default syntactic preferences for Dutch sentences with subject- and object-control verbs.
- Experiment 2: On-line electroencephalography (ERP) study to measure brain responses during auditory sentence processing.
- Manipulation of prosodic breaks (PB) in locally ambiguous sentences and analysis of N400 effects and closure positive shifts.
Main Results:
- Subject- and object-control verbs differentially influence listeners' expected syntactic structures.
- Prosodic breaks (PB) elicited a closure positive shift, consistent with prior research.
- In subject-control items, an N400 effect indicated a default preference aligning with the PB's effect.
- In object-control items, an N400 effect was observed with a PB, but not without it, suggesting PB's influence on syntactic analysis.
Conclusions:
- Prosodic information, specifically prosodic breaks, can significantly affect syntactic analysis during auditory sentence processing.
- The influence of prosodic breaks on syntactic resolution interacts with verb control type.
- Prosodic breaks aid in resolving syntactic ambiguity for object-control verbs, but their effect is less pronounced for subject-control verbs due to pre-existing biases.
More Related Videos
09:27Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
Published on: October 13, 2018
07:36Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
Published on: November 30, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Components of Language
Language and Cognition
Language Development
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior
Higher Mental Functions of the Brain: Language
Language formation and comprehension take place in the dominant hemisphere. The dominant hemisphere is responsible for understanding the meaning of spoken, written, or sign language, as well as the ability to communicate. For most people, the left hemisphere is the dominant one. The right hemisphere, then, gives tone and emotional context to the...
Conjugation