Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Protein Organization01:24

Protein Organization

Proteins are polymers of amino acid residues. They are versatile and responsible for different cellular functions, including DNA replication, molecular transport, catalysis, and structural support. Proteins have a hierarchical structure comprising at least three levels of organization: primary, secondary, and tertiary structure. Some large proteins have a quaternary structure where individual protein subunits are linked together.
The primary structure of a protein is its amino acid sequence.
Protein Organization01:13

Protein Organization

Overview
Protein Organization01:24

Protein Organization

Proteins are polymers of amino acid residues. They are versatile and responsible for different cellular functions, including DNA replication, molecular transport, catalysis, and structural support. Proteins have a hierarchical structure comprising at least three levels of organization: primary, secondary, and tertiary structure. Some large proteins have a quaternary structure where individual protein subunits are linked together.
The primary structure of a protein is its amino acid sequence.
Protein Organization01:13

Protein Organization

Overview
Tagging and Fusion Proteins01:24

Tagging and Fusion Proteins

Proteins are involved in several cellular processes and biochemical reactions. Analyzing a specific protein of interest requires it to be isolated from the other proteins in the cell. This is achieved by overexpressing the specific gene in a suitable host to produce large quantities of the target protein. A tag or label is recombined with the gene to produce a fusion protein containing the target protein and the tag. The tags on these fusion proteins can then be used for easy detection and...
Protein Families02:47

Protein Families

Protein families are groups of homologous proteins; that is, they have similarities in amino acid sequences and three-dimensional structures. Protein families usually occur because of gene duplication, where an additional copy of a gene is inserted into the genome of an organism.   Mutations that change the amino acids but still allow the protein to be properly synthesized, will lead to new protein family members.   If these new proteins contain similar amino acids in key locations, protein...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Design and evaluation of an ontology based information extraction system for radiological reports.

Computers in biology and medicine·2010
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 23, 2026

An Integrated Approach for Microprotein Identification and Sequence Analysis
09:37

An Integrated Approach for Microprotein Identification and Sequence Analysis

Published on: July 12, 2022

Two learning approaches for protein name extraction.

Serhan Tatar1, Ilyas Cicekli

  • 1Department of Computer Engineering, Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey. statar@cs.bilkent.edu.tr

Journal of Biomedical Informatics
|May 19, 2009
PubMed
Summary

This study evaluates two machine learning methods for automatic protein name extraction from biological texts. The Bigram language model achieved higher accuracy (up to 67.7% F-score) than the rule learning method (up to 61.8% F-score).

More Related Videos

Electronic Tongue Generating Continuous Recognition Patterns for Protein Analysis
08:46

Electronic Tongue Generating Continuous Recognition Patterns for Protein Analysis

Published on: September 16, 2014

Creating and Applying a Reference to Facilitate the Discussion and Classification of Proteins in a Diverse Group
07:49

Creating and Applying a Reference to Facilitate the Discussion and Classification of Proteins in a Diverse Group

Published on: August 16, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 23, 2026

An Integrated Approach for Microprotein Identification and Sequence Analysis
09:37

An Integrated Approach for Microprotein Identification and Sequence Analysis

Published on: July 12, 2022

Electronic Tongue Generating Continuous Recognition Patterns for Protein Analysis
08:46

Electronic Tongue Generating Continuous Recognition Patterns for Protein Analysis

Published on: September 16, 2014

Creating and Applying a Reference to Facilitate the Discussion and Classification of Proteins in a Diverse Group
07:49

Creating and Applying a Reference to Facilitate the Discussion and Classification of Proteins in a Diverse Group

Published on: August 16, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Computational Biology
  • Bioinformatics
  • Natural Language Processing

Background:

  • Automatic protein name extraction is crucial for processing biomedical literature but remains a significant challenge.
  • Accurate identification of protein names is a fundamental step for information extraction in biological texts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore and compare the effectiveness of two distinct machine learning techniques for protein name extraction.
  • To generalize protein names using hierarchically categorized syntactic token types in both methods.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a Bigram language model for protein name extraction.
  • Employed an automatic rule learning method to identify protein names within biological texts.
  • Conducted experiments on two datasets: YAPEX and GENIA corpus.

Main Results:

  • The Bigram language model achieved an F-score of 67.7% on YAPEX and 66.8% on GENIA.
  • The automatic rule learning method obtained an F-score of 61.8% on YAPEX and 61.0% on GENIA.
  • Both methods demonstrated applicability to automatic protein name extraction.

Conclusions:

  • The Bigram language model outperformed the rule learning method in protein name extraction accuracy.
  • Both evaluated machine learning techniques are viable for large-scale biomedical literature processing.
  • Further research can build upon these methods for improved information extraction from scientific texts.