Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Technique and Patient Selection Criteria of Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy for Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement
Published on: March 26, 2018
Is a minimally invasive approach for re-operative mitral valve surgery superior to standard resternotomy?
Michele Murzi1, Marco Solinas, Mattia Glauber
1Department of Adult Cardiac Surgery, G Pasquinucci Heart Hospital, Massa, Italy. michelem@ifc.cnr.it
Insights
Minimally invasive mitral valve re-operation offers similar mortality to sternotomy but improves patient satisfaction. This approach reduces bleeding, blood transfusions, and sternal wound infections, with shorter hospital stays.
Area of Science:
- Cardiac Surgery
- Thoracic Surgery
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
Background:
- Re-operative mitral valve surgery is complex.
- Standard sternotomy carries risks, especially in re-operations.
- Minimally invasive techniques are emerging as alternatives.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive versus standard sternotomy for re-operative mitral valve surgery.
- To evaluate patient outcomes and satisfaction between the two surgical approaches.
Main Methods:
- A systematic review of 48 identified papers was conducted.
- Nine papers representing the best evidence were selected for analysis.
- Data on operative mortality, patient satisfaction, bleeding, transfusions, and hospital stay were tabulated.
Main Results:
- Minimally invasive mitral valve re-operation demonstrated operative mortality comparable to standard sternotomy.
- Patient satisfaction was higher with the minimally invasive approach.
- Advantages included less postoperative bleeding, reduced blood transfusion requirements, and no sternal wound infections.
Conclusions:
- Minimally invasive mitral valve re-operation is a viable alternative to sternotomy.
- It offers comparable safety with enhanced patient satisfaction and fewer complications.
- Shorter hospital stays and ventilation times are potential benefits.
Abstract:
A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was 'Is a minimally invasive approach superior to standard sternotomy for re-operative mitral valve surgery?'. Altogether 48 papers were found using the reported search, of which 9 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. We conclude that minimally invasive mitral valve re-operation can be performed with an operative mortality similar to standard sternotomy approach but with a higher patient satisfaction. Less postoperative bleeding, reduced need for blood transfusion and absence of sternal wound infection are the main advantages of this technique. Mean hospital stays and ventilation time appear to be reduced with this approach.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis IV: Nursing Management
Mitral Valve Prolapse III: Nursing Management

