Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...
Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
Guidelines for Writing Outcome01:11

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when researchers try to extrapolate results...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Long COVID symptoms before and 3-35 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection in a Norwegian prospective cohort study, symptoms over the pandemic, and different virus variants.

International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases·2026
Same author

Individually tailored monitoring at home after hospitalization for HEART failure (IT-HEART): design and baseline characteristics of a randomized clinical trial.

Heart failure reviews·2026
Same author

Beta-blockers, depression, and anxiety after myocardial infarction: the BETAMI-DANBLOCK trial.

European heart journal·2026
Same author

Deaths potentially averted by small changes in physical activity and sedentary time: an individual participant data meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.

Lancet (London, England)·2026
Same author

Author Reply.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2025
Same author

Editor's Choice - Norwegian Randomised Trial of Laparoscopic versus Open Aortobifemoral Bypass: The Norwegian Laparoscopic Aortic Surgery Trial (NLAST).

European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 23, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

Outcome based subgroup analysis: a neglected concern.

Karim F Hirji1, Morten W Fagerland

  • 1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. kfhirji@aol.com

Trials
|May 21, 2009
PubMed
Summary

This study reveals hidden biases in outcome-based subgroup analyses in clinical trials. A simple method to include all subjects can counter this analytic bias, improving trial integrity.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Research Integrity

Background:

  • Subgroup analyses in clinical trials often focus on proper subgroups (defined by baseline characteristics).
  • Improper subgroups (defined by post-randomization events) are frequently analyzed without awareness of their inherent pitfalls.
  • Existing scrutiny of subgroup analyses has largely overlooked the biases associated with improper, outcome-based subgroups.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the prevalence and distinct methods of outcome-based subgroup analysis.
  • To describe the specific hazards and biases associated with this type of analysis.
  • To propose a straightforward alternative approach to mitigate analytic bias.

Main Methods:

  • Review of data from six published clinical trials to identify patterns of outcome-based subgroup analysis.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 23, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

  • Illustration of hidden biases using six hypothetical trial scenarios.
  • Proposal of an alternative analysis method involving scoring and inclusion of all randomized subjects.

    • Main Results:

    • Outcome-based subgroup analyses share common issues with proper subgroup analyses, including post-hoc execution, over-analysis, selective reporting, and over-interpretation.
    • Hidden biases are prevalent in outcome-based subgroup analyses, as demonstrated by hypothetical scenarios.
    • A proposed method of assigning scores to excluded subjects and including all participants can address these biases.

    Conclusions:

    • Increased awareness regarding the practice and potential pitfalls of outcome-based subgroup analysis is crucial.
    • To maintain the integrity of randomization, outcome-based subgroup analyses must be carefully considered.
    • Greater practical and methodologic attention is needed to address the challenges posed by outcome-based subgroup analyses.