Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Transmission-based Precautions II: Airborne and Protective Environment01:25

Transmission-based Precautions II: Airborne and Protective Environment

Transmission-based precautions are for patients infected or suspected to be infected (or colonized) with organisms posing a significant risk to others. The transmission precautions include airborne and protective environment precautions.
Airborne precautions:
Use airborne precautions when treating patients known or suspected to have diseases that spread through the air—for example, tuberculosis or measles. These organisms are present in smaller droplets expelled by an infected person and...
Personal Protective Equipment01:20

Personal Protective Equipment

Personal protective equipment (PPE) is unique clothing or equipment worn by an employee to minimize or prevent exposure to infectious agents. PPE creates a barrier between the employee and the infectious materials. PPE must be readily available in the patient care area. PPE includes gloves, gowns and aprons, masks and respirators, goggles, face shields, shoes, and headcovers:
Standard Precaution01:26

Standard Precaution

Standard precautions are the minimum infection control safeguards used while caring for all patients, irrespective of their disease condition. They help prevent the spread of common infectious microorganisms to healthcare workers, patients, and visitors in all healthcare settings.
Hand hygiene is the most crucial means to prevent the transmission of disease. Employers are legally required to provide their workers with personal protective equipment (PPE) to minimize exposure or contact with...
Ethical Standards I01:25

Ethical Standards I

The American Nurses Association (ANA) created and implemented the first nationally accepted Code of Ethics for Nurses with Interpretive Statements. The Code of Ethics is a living document regularly updated by the ANA and establishes an ethical standard that is non-negotiable for nurses in all roles and settings.
The Code of Ethics provisions outline the nurse's duty to the patient, the healthcare team, the profession, and society. The Code's fundamental principles include advocacy,...
Ethical Standards II01:23

Ethical Standards II

Ethical standards are the backbone of nursing practice, guiding nurses as they interact with patients, families, and colleagues. These standards are crucial for providing safe, empathetic care centered on the patient's needs.
Nurses are entrusted with upholding various ethical principles and standards. Nurses forge solid therapeutic relationships using trust, empathy, autonomy, confidentiality, and professional competence.
Confidentiality is crucial, embodying respect for individual privacy and...
Techniques of therapeutic communication I: Active Listening, Sharing Observations, Validation, and Using Touch01:15

Techniques of therapeutic communication I: Active Listening, Sharing Observations, Validation, and Using Touch

The history of therapeutic communication can be traced back to Florence Nightingale, who emphasized the importance of developing trusting relationships with patients. She taught that the presence of nurses with patients results in therapeutic healing.
Therapeutic communication is not the same as social interaction. Social interaction has no goal or purpose and consists of casual information sharing, whereas therapeutic communication has a plan or purpose for the conversation. Therapeutic...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Trialability.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2025
Same author

Moral philosophy has much more to offer.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2022
Same author

Editorial: The Psychology of Pseudoscience.

Frontiers in psychology·2022
Same author

The ethics of explantation.

BMC medical ethics·2021
Same author

Who should be tested in a pandemic? Ethical considerations.

BMC medical ethics·2021
Same author

Neuroethics for Fantasyland or for the Clinic? The Limitations of Speculative Ethics.

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Assessment of the Cytotoxic and Immunomodulatory Effects of Substances in Human Precision-cut Lung Slices
12:04

Assessment of the Cytotoxic and Immunomodulatory Effects of Substances in Human Precision-cut Lung Slices

Published on: May 9, 2018

Should we protect the most sensitive people?

Sven Ove Hansson1

  • 1Department of Philosophy and the History of Technology, Royal Institute of Technology, Teknikringen 78, 100 44 Stockholm, Sweden. soh@kth.se

Journal of Radiological Protection : Official Journal of the Society for Radiological Protection
|May 21, 2009
PubMed
Summary

Radiation protection standards should consider specific subgroup risks, not just population averages. This ensures ethical and effective protection for all individuals, especially sensitive populations, by tailoring safety measures.

More Related Videos

An Automated Microscopic Scoring Method for the γ-H2AX Foci Assay in Human Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes
08:23

An Automated Microscopic Scoring Method for the γ-H2AX Foci Assay in Human Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes

Published on: December 25, 2021

Social Threat-Safety Test Uncovers Psychosocial Stress-Related Phenotypes
05:03

Social Threat-Safety Test Uncovers Psychosocial Stress-Related Phenotypes

Published on: December 15, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Assessment of the Cytotoxic and Immunomodulatory Effects of Substances in Human Precision-cut Lung Slices
12:04

Assessment of the Cytotoxic and Immunomodulatory Effects of Substances in Human Precision-cut Lung Slices

Published on: May 9, 2018

An Automated Microscopic Scoring Method for the γ-H2AX Foci Assay in Human Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes
08:23

An Automated Microscopic Scoring Method for the γ-H2AX Foci Assay in Human Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes

Published on: December 25, 2021

Social Threat-Safety Test Uncovers Psychosocial Stress-Related Phenotypes
05:03

Social Threat-Safety Test Uncovers Psychosocial Stress-Related Phenotypes

Published on: December 15, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Radiation protection
  • Radiological health
  • Public health ethics

Background:

  • Current International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) recommendations utilize population-averaged risk data.
  • This approach raises ethical concerns regarding individual and subgroup protection from radiation exposure.
  • Ethical radiation protection necessitates considering specific risks to identifiable subpopulations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the ethical implications of using population-averaged data for radiation protection.
  • To advocate for radiation risk assessments that account for group-specific data.
  • To explore strategies for protecting sensitive subpopulations from radiation exposure.

Main Methods:

  • Ethical analysis of current radiation protection frameworks.
  • Review of risk assessment methodologies in radiological protection.
  • Identification and comparison of differentiated and unified protection strategies.

Main Results:

  • Population-averaged radiation risk data may not adequately protect sensitive subgroups.
  • Individualized and group-specific risk information is ethically warranted.
  • Two primary strategies for protecting sensitive groups exist: differentiated and unified protection.

Conclusions:

  • Radiation protection standards must move beyond population averages to address subgroup-specific risks.
  • Ethical radiation protection requires defensible risk assessments for each identifiable group.
  • The choice between differentiated and unified protection strategies depends on specific factors relevant to sensitive groups.