Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction
08:26

Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction

Published on: March 24, 2023

[Laparoscopic appendectomy. The new standard?].

F Köckerling1, C Schug-Pass, S Grund

  • 1Klinik für Chirurgie - Visceral- und Gefässchirurgie, Vivantes Klinikum Spandau, Neue Bergstrasse 6, Berlin, Germany. ferdinand.koeckerling@vivantes.de

Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift Fur Alle Gebiete Der Operativen Medizen
|May 21, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy01:26

Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy

Sigmoidoscopy and laparoscopy are distinct medical procedures that enable physicians to internally inspect different parts of the GI tract. Although they serve different purposes, each is essential for diagnosing and, in some cases, treating various medical conditions.
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Outcomes of inguinal hernia repair in octogenarians: A propensity score-matched analysis of the Herniamed Registry.

Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery·2026
Same author

Geriatric rehabilitation in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland (DACH region): a current state analysis.

European geriatric medicine·2026
Same author

Intraoperative Fascial Traction - From Concept to Comprehensive Application.

Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS·2026
Same author

Main confounders associated with the outcome of inpatient incisional hernia repair for decision making in ambulatory surgery.

Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery·2026
Same author

Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie·2026
Same author

[Geriatrie rehabilitation in different settings].

Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie·2025
Same journal

[S3 Guideline "Adult soft tissue sarcomas"].

Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen·2022
Same journal

[Synopsis-S3 guidelines pancreatic cancer].

Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen·2022
Same journal

[Laparoscopic sentinel node navigation surgery in gastric cancer to reduce surgical radicality].

Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen·2022
Same journal

[Future concepts for neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment of (resectable) pancreatic cancer].

Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen·2022
Same journal

[ASCO guidelines for the treatment of stage III NSCLC part 4: indications for adjuvant therapy].

Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen·2022
Same journal

[Surgical treatment of pancreatic cancer-What is new?]

Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen·2022
See all related articles

Laparoscopic appendectomy offers benefits like fewer infections but has drawbacks. Surgeon experience significantly impacts outcomes, making open surgery the standard, though laparoscopy excels in complex cases.

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Innovation
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Gastrointestinal Surgery

Background:

  • Laparoscopic appendectomy, introduced in 1983, remains a subject of debate.
  • Meta-analyses suggest advantages such as reduced wound infections and pain, but also note higher abscess rates and costs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the efficacy and outcomes of laparoscopic appendectomy compared to conventional open surgery.
  • To identify factors influencing the discrepancies in reported outcomes for laparoscopic appendectomy.

Main Methods:

  • Review of meta-analyses and studies comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy.
  • Analysis of factors influencing surgical outcomes, including surgeon experience and patient characteristics.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction
08:26

Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction

Published on: March 24, 2023

Main Results:

  • While laparoscopy shows benefits, outcomes are highly dependent on surgeon expertise.
  • Open appendectomy (McBurney incision) is considered the gold standard due to consistent results.
  • Laparoscopic appendectomy can yield superior results in specific scenarios, including complicated appendicitis and obese patients, but incurs higher costs.

Conclusions:

  • Surgeon experience is a critical determinant of laparoscopic appendectomy success.
  • Conventional open appendectomy remains the benchmark, but experienced laparoscopic surgeons can achieve better outcomes.
  • Laparoscopic appendectomy is advantageous for select patient groups and complex cases, despite higher associated costs.