Reporting and interpreting research in PSPB: practices, principles, and pragmatics
Deborah A Kashy1, M Brent Donnellan, Robert A Ackerman
1Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA. kashyd@msu.edu
Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin
|May 22, 2009
Summary
This study reviews reporting practices in social and personality psychology journals. Recommendations are provided to improve transparency and reproducibility in quantitative research reporting.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Social Psychology
- Quantitative Research
Background:
- Psychologists publishing in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (PSPB) need guidance on reporting analyses and results.
- Current reporting practices in social and personality psychology may lack sufficient detail.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess current reporting standards in quantitative psychological research.
- To develop recommendations for enhancing transparency in research reports.
- To facilitate replication and critical evaluation of studies in personality and social psychology.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of articles published in PSPB during the first half of 2007.
- Evaluation of the completeness of Method and Results sections for quantitative research.
Main Results:
- Identified areas where reporting practices in PSPB could be improved.
- Highlighted a need for greater detail in the reporting of quantitative analyses and results.
Conclusions:
- Enhanced transparency in research reporting is crucial for scientific progress.
- Implementing the suggested recommendations can improve the quality and reproducibility of psychological research.
- Increased transparency supports replication and critical appraisal of findings in personality and social psychology.
Related Concept Videos
01:56Ethics in Research
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
02:30Naturalistic Observations
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
01:30Scientific Nature of Social Psychology
Social psychology is a scientific discipline dedicated to understanding how individuals think, feel, and behave in social contexts. Unlike common sense, which relies on anecdotal experiences and intuition, social psychology employs systematic research and empirical methods to ensure objectivity and reliability. This distinction is fundamental in distinguishing scientifically supported findings from mere speculation.Four fundamental scientific values guide a structured approach to research in...
01:13Psychology as a Science
Psychology, as a scientific discipline, aims to understand the mind and behavior through rigorous and systematic methods. The foundation of psychological research is evidence-based, relying heavily on the scientific method to derive and validate knowledge. This structured approach ensures that findings are reliable, valid, and applicable to broader contexts.
The scientific method in psychology involves six critical steps: making observations, formulating hypotheses, conducting tests, analyzing...
The scientific method in psychology involves six critical steps: making observations, formulating hypotheses, conducting tests, analyzing...
01:26Types of Reports III: Telephone and Verbal Reports
Telephone and Verbal Reports in healthcare settings are two communication methods for conveying therapeutic instructions from healthcare providers to nurses or other healthcare staff.
Here's an overview of each type:
Telephone Orders
Here's an overview of each type:
Telephone Orders
01:37Statistical Significance
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...