Screening for motor deficits using the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) in children with language
1Jewish Rehabilitation Hospital, Centre de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Réadaptation du Montréal Métropolitain (CRIR), Quebec, Canada.
Insights
The Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) is not accurate for screening motor deficits in children with primary language impairment (PLI). More sensitive motor performance measures are needed for this population.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric occupational therapy
- Developmental pediatrics
- Child language disorders
Background:
- Primary language impairment (PLI) affects children's communication development.
- Motor skills are crucial for overall child development and participation.
- Accurate assessment tools are needed to identify potential developmental delays.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the correlation between the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) motor and self-care domains and the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-second edition (PDMS-2) gross and fine motor sub-scales.
- To assess the PEDI's utility in identifying motor deficits in children with PLI.
Main Methods:
- Forty children aged 35-62 months with PLI were enrolled.
- The PEDI was administered at admission.
- The PDMS-2 was administered by an occupational therapist unaware of PEDI results within one month.
Main Results:
- A weak correlation was found between PEDI mobility and PDMS-2 gross motor scores (r = 0.23, p = 0.15).
- A weak correlation was observed between PEDI self-care and PDMS-2 fine motor scores (r = 0.12, p = 0.47).
- Associations across age, gender, and language impairment severity subgroups were poor-to-moderate.
Conclusions:
- The PEDI is not sufficiently accurate for screening motor deficits in children with PLI.
- Current findings suggest the PEDI may miss subtle motor impairments in this population.
- More sensitive motor assessment tools are recommended for children with PLI.
Objective:
To evaluate the association between the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) motor and self-care domains with the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-second edition (PDMS-2) gross motor and fine motor sub-scales.
Methods:
Forty children (35-62 months) with primary language impairment (PLI) were recruited. The PEDI was completed at admission and the PDMS-2 was administered within 1 month by an OT, who was unaware of the PEDI results.
Results:
Correlation between PEDI mobility and PDMS-2 gross motor domains was r = 0.23 (p = 0.15) and between PEDI self-care and PDMS-2 fine motor domains was r = 0.12 (p = 0.47). Associations between PEDI and PDMS-2 scores for age, gender and severity of language impairment sub-groups were poor-to-moderate.
Conclusion:
Findings indicate the PEDI is not sufficiently accurate to screen for motor deficits in children with PLI. More sensitive measures of motor performance are needed to detect subtle motor deficits in children with PLI.
Related Concept Videos
Learning Disabilities
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...
Intellectual Disability

