Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2026

Coronary Progenitor Cells and Soluble Biomarkers in Cardiovascular Prognosis after Coronary Angioplasty
Published on: January 28, 2020
[Biomarkers for detection and prediction in acute coronary syndrome]
Amparo Galán1, Antonio Curós, Vicente Valle
1Servicios de Bioquímica y Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, España. agalan.germanstrias.cat
Insights
Diagnosing acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is challenging. New biomarkers could improve early risk assessment, potentially reducing emergency visits and adverse events.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Biochemistry
- Clinical Diagnostics
Context:
- Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) diagnosis in emergency departments presents challenges.
- Current gold standard biomarkers (Troponin, CKMB) are effective but may not predict future events.
- Existing guidelines recommend Troponin and CKMB, with other biomarkers having lower evidence levels.
Purpose:
- To review the clinical utility of novel biomarkers for ACS risk stratification.
- To explore new biomarkers for earlier patient risk assessment and event prediction.
- To enhance understanding of ACS pathophysiology.
Summary:
- This review examines emerging biomarkers beyond Troponin and CKMB for diagnosing and stratifying ACS risk.
- Investigates potential biomarkers including inflammatory cytokines, adhesion molecules, and ischemia markers.
- Highlights the need for reliable biomarkers to anticipate ACS presentation and improve patient outcomes.
Impact:
- Novel biomarkers could enable earlier risk assessment in ACS patients.
- Potential to reduce emergency department consultations and prevent adverse cardiovascular events.
- Improved diagnostic tools may lead to more personalized and effective ACS management.
Abstract:
Diagnosis of patients with suggestive symptoms of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), in an emergency department, is problematic. Troponine or CKMB are the gold standard biochemical markers to diagnose the ACS, and the clinical practice guidelines of the various scientific societies recommend their use with the best available evidence. Other biomarkers such as myoglobin, hs-PCR and natriuretic peptides, support the diagnosis of ACS although its recognition in clinical practice guidelines has a lower level of evidence. New biomarkers with sufficient reliability would be necessary to anticipate the clinical presentation of the entity. There are biomarkers such as inflammatory cytokines, cellular adhesion molecules, acute-phase reactants, plaque destabilization and rupture biomarkers, markers of myocardial ischemia and stretch, that may provide earlier assessment of the overall risk of the patient and help identify future events. Possibly, its clinical use would decrease the number of consultations in the emergency department and help prevent future adverse effects. The objective of this review is to study the potential clinical utility of new biomarkers of risk stratification in patients with ACS, as well as deepen the knowledge of the pathophysiology of this syndrome.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System I: Cardiac Biomarkers
The essential diagnostic tools for detecting myocardial necrosis and monitoring individuals suspected of having acute coronary syndrome (ACS) include:
Troponins
Troponins, particularly cardiac troponins I and T, are the most precise and sensitive markers of myocardial injury. They are detectable within 4-6 hours of myocardial injury and remain...
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System II: CRP, Hcy, and Cardiac Natriuretic Peptide Markers
These markers indicate stress or strain on the heart muscle:
Natriuretic Peptides (BNP)
Cardiac myocytes produce these hormones in response to ventricular stretching...
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management
