Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2026

08:09
Vessel-sparing Excision and Primary Anastomosis
Published on: January 7, 2019
Two-stage repair in hypospadias
Summary
The two-stage hypospadias repair is preferred for severe cases, failures, and balanitis xerotica obliterans. This method offers excellent cosmetic outcomes with low complication rates, though long-term voiding issues can occur.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Pediatric Surgery
- Reconstructive Surgery
Background:
- Hypospadias repair is a common pediatric urological procedure.
- The one-stage tubularized incised plate urethroplasty is standard for most cases.
- Severe cases, hypospadias failures, and balanitis xerotica obliterans may benefit from a staged approach.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the utility and outcomes of the two-stage approach in hypospadias repair.
- To compare the two-stage approach with one-stage methods for specific patient groups.
Main Methods:
- Nonsystematic review of the two-stage hypospadias repair technique.
- First stage: penile straightening and urethral plate substitution with grafts (preputial, oral mucosa, postauricular skin).
- Second stage (6 months later): urethroplasty via graft tubulization.
Main Results:
- Excellent graft take with minimal need for additional patches.
- Low morbidity: 6% fistula rate, 2% stricture rate.
- Long-term cosmetic results are excellent; however, voiding/ejaculatory issues may affect up to 40% if a long urethral tube is created.
Conclusions:
- The two-stage approach is a viable and effective option for complex hypospadias cases and revisions.
- While technically simple, experience improves outcomes and reduces complication rates.
- Waterproofing layers can significantly decrease fistula rates, and long-term functional outcomes require consideration.
